[2023] UGCommC 58
The court found that the applicants' affidavit in support of the application contained numerous falsehoods regarding the status of their bank accounts, which had not been frozen at the material time as claimed. Evidence from Stanbic Bank confirmed that the freeze order was lifted prior to the application. The court...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] UGCommC 58
- Parties
- Applicant: A. I. B International Ventures Ltd.; Applicant: Abubaker Ismail; Respondent: Abdullah Ismail
- Court
- Commercial Court of Uganda
- Jurisdiction
- Uganda
- Judgment Date
- 9 August 2023
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Application 1747 of 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application to Set Aside Default Judgment and for Leave to Defend
- Outcome
- application dismissed with costs to the respondent
- Judges
- Harriet Grace Magala, J
- Legal Topics
- Setting Aside Default Judgment, Leave to Defend, Affidavit Falsehoods, Bank Account Freeze, Summary Procedure
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
A. I. B International Ventures Ltd.
Applicant
Abubaker Ismail
Applicant
Abdullah Ismail
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application to Set Aside Default Judgment and for Leave to Defend
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the application raises triable issues.
- 2 What other remedies are available to the parties?
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicants' affidavit in support of the application contained numerous falsehoods regarding the status of their bank accounts, which had not been frozen at the material time as claimed. Evidence from Stanbic Bank confirmed that the freeze order was lifted prior to the application. The court held that an application supported by an affidavit containing untruths is unworthy of consideration and must be dismissed. The applicants failed to demonstrate any bona fide triable issue or plausible defence, and their conduct amounted to misleading the court. Consequently, the application to set aside the default judgment and for leave to defend was dismissed with costs to...
Court Disposition
application dismissed with costs to the respondent
Orders
- The application is dismissed with costs to the respondent.
- The respondent is at liberty to proceed with execution of the decree in Civil Suit No. 0982 of 2022.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment