[1992] UGHC 2

[1992] UGHC 2

The court held that the supporting affidavit to the originating summons was incurably defective because it failed to distinguish between facts based on the deponent's knowledge and those based on belief, did not disclose the source of information for facts deponed to on information, and did not provide grounds for...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[1992] UGHC 2
Parties
Plaintiff: Allen Isingoma; Defendant: Alex Muhairwe & Two Others
Court
High Court of Uganda
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Number
Criminal Case No. 39 of 1992
Procedural Posture
Originating Summons / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Outcome
application dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
Affidavit Requirements, Originating Summons, Preliminary Objection, Defective Affidavit
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Affidavit Requirements Originating Summons Preliminary Objection Defective Affidavit

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Allen Isingoma

Plaintiff

Alex Muhairwe & Two Others

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Originating Summons / Ruling on Preliminary Objection

  1. 1 Whether the supporting affidavit to the originating summons is incurably defective for failure to disclose sources of information, grounds of belief, and to distinguish between knowledge, information, and belief.
  2. 2 Whether the originating summons is incompetent and improperly before the court due to the defective affidavit.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the supporting affidavit to the originating summons was incurably defective because it failed to distinguish between facts based on the deponent's knowledge and those based on belief, did not disclose the source of information for facts deponed to on information, and did not provide grounds for belief for facts deponed to on belief. These omissions were not minor irregularities but fundamental defects that went to the root of the affidavit, rendering it unreliable and non-compliant with the requirements of O.34 r.7 CPR and established case law. As a result, the originating summons was left without a valid supporting affidavit, making it incompetent and improperly...

Court Disposition

application dismissed with costs

Orders

  • The application is dismissed with costs to the defendants.