[2016] AfCHPR 58

[2016] AfCHPR 58

The Court found that it had prima facie jurisdiction to consider the application for provisional measures, as the alleged violations concerned rights protected under the African Charter and the respondent state had ratified the relevant instruments and accepted the Court's competence. The applicant, being on death...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2016] AfCHPR 58
Parties
Applicant: Mulokozi Anatory; Respondent: The United Republic of Tanzania
Court
African Court on Human and Peoples Rights
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Number
Application No. 057/2016
Procedural Posture
Application for Provisional Measures / Interlocutory Order on Provisional Measures
Outcome
Provisional measures granted.
Judges
Ben Achour J, Bossa J, Eno R, Guissè J, Kioko VP, Matusse J, Mengue J, Mukamulisa J, Niyungeko J, Orè P
Legal Topics
Right to Fair Trial, Death Penalty, Provisional Measures, Irreparable Harm
Source Language
en
Constitutional Law Criminal Law Right to Fair Trial Death Penalty Provisional Measures Irreparable Harm

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mulokozi Anatory

Applicant

The United Republic of Tanzania

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Application for Provisional Measures / Interlocutory Order on Provisional Measures

  1. 1 Whether the Court has prima facie jurisdiction to entertain the application for provisional measures.
  2. 2 Whether the circumstances justify the grant of provisional measures to prevent irreparable harm to the applicant.
  3. 3 Whether the execution of the death penalty before determination of the main application would violate the applicant's rights.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court found that it had prima facie jurisdiction to consider the application for provisional measures, as the alleged violations concerned rights protected under the African Charter and the respondent state had ratified the relevant instruments and accepted the Court's competence. The applicant, being on death row, faced a situation of extreme gravity and risk of irreparable harm if the death penalty were executed before the main application was determined. The Court held that, to preserve the status quo and prevent irreparable harm, it was necessary to order the respondent to refrain from executing the applicant pending the final determination of the case. This order was made without...

Court Disposition

Provisional measures granted.

Orders

  • The respondent is ordered to refrain from executing the death penalty against the applicant pending the determination of the application.
  • The respondent is ordered to report to the Court within sixty days of receipt of the order on the measures taken to implement the order.