[2023] UGHCCD 310

[2023] UGHCCD 310

The court found that substituted service of the hearing notice was properly effected by affixing the notice to the High Court, Gulu Notice Board as ordered. Despite this, neither the plaintiffs nor the defendants, nor their respective counsel, appeared for the hearing. Given the absence of both parties and the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] UGHCCD 310
Parties
Plaintiff: Mrs. Christine Anywar; Plaintiff: Rose Alilo; Defendant: Mr. Christopher Alioma; Defendant: Mr. Leni Gilbert Boniface; Defendant: Andama Martin; Defendant: The Red Pepper Publications Ltd
Court
HC: Civil Division (Uganda)
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Number
Civil Suit 27 of 2015
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Ruling on Non Appearance and Dismissal
Outcome
suit dismissed for non-appearance of parties
Judges
Mwaka, J
Legal Topics
Dismissal for Non Appearance, Substituted Service, Libel, Defamation
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Tort Law Dismissal for Non Appearance Substituted Service Libel Defamation

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mrs. Christine Anywar

Plaintiff

Rose Alilo

Plaintiff

Mr. Christopher Alioma

Defendant

Mr. Leni Gilbert Boniface

Defendant

Andama Martin

Defendant

The Red Pepper Publications Ltd

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Suit / Ruling on Non Appearance and Dismissal

  1. 1 Whether substituted service of the hearing notice was properly effected on the parties.
  2. 2 Whether the suit should be dismissed for non-appearance of both parties.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that substituted service of the hearing notice was properly effected by affixing the notice to the High Court, Gulu Notice Board as ordered. Despite this, neither the plaintiffs nor the defendants, nor their respective counsel, appeared for the hearing. Given the absence of both parties and the existence of case backlog, the court exercised its discretion under Order 9 Rule 17 of the Civil Procedure Rules to dismiss the suit for non-appearance. Each party was ordered to bear its own costs, as no party took steps to prosecute or defend the matter after proper service was confirmed.

Court Disposition

suit dismissed for non-appearance of parties

Orders

  • Civil Suit No. 27/2015 is hereby dismissed under Order 9 Rule 17 of the Civil Procedure Rules, SI 71-1 for non-appearance of the parties.
  • Each party shall bear its own costs.