[2009] UGHC 41

[2009] UGHC 41

The court found that the plaintiff had fully performed its contractual obligations by supplying the seeds and seedlings as agreed, and that the defendant had no valid contractual basis to withhold payment on the grounds of donor funding. The contract did not stipulate that payment was conditional upon donor funds,...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2009] UGHC 41
Parties
Plaintiff: ARIDEP INVESTMENT UGANDA LTD; Defendant: PADER DISTRICT LOCAL GOVERNMENT
Court
High Court of Uganda
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Number
Civil Suit No. 13 of 2005
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Judgment
Outcome
judgment for the plaintiff
Legal Topics
Breach of Contract, Contractual Liability, Damages Assessment, Arbitration Clauses
Source Language
en
Commercial and Corporate Civil Procedure Breach of Contract Contractual Liability Damages Assessment Arbitration Clauses

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

ARIDEP INVESTMENT UGANDA LTD

Plaintiff

PADER DISTRICT LOCAL GOVERNMENT

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Suit / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the suit is properly before court.
  2. 2 Whether or not there was breach of contract.
  3. 3 Whether the parties are entitled to the reliefs prayed for.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiff had fully performed its contractual obligations by supplying the seeds and seedlings as agreed, and that the defendant had no valid contractual basis to withhold payment on the grounds of donor funding. The contract did not stipulate that payment was conditional upon donor funds, and the defendant, having participated in the proceedings without seeking a stay for arbitration, could not challenge the court's jurisdiction. The defendant's alternative arguments regarding lack of local purchase orders and alleged delivery breaches were unsupported by evidence, and the defendant admitted liability for part of the claim. The court held that the defendant...

Court Disposition

judgment for the plaintiff

Orders

  • The defendant shall pay the plaintiff UGX 10,210,124 as the principal sum.
  • The defendant shall pay the plaintiff UGX 2,000,000 as general damages for breach of contract.