[2016] UGCC 3

[2016] UGCC 3

The court found that the applicant had demonstrated sufficient grounds for the issuance of interim orders to restrain the respondents from engaging in the defiance campaign and related activities, as such actions could undermine public order and the administration of justice. The court exercised its discretion to...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2016] UGCC 3
Parties
Applicant: Attorney General; Respondent: Forum for Democratic Change (FDC); Respondent: Col. (Rtd) Dr. Kizza Besigye
Court
Constitutional Court of Uganda
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Judgment Date
29 April 2016
Case Number
Constitutional Application No. 18 of 2016
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Application / Interim Order
Outcome
interim orders granted
Legal Topics
Interim Injunctions, Freedom of Assembly, Public Order, Defiance Campaign
Source Language
english
Constitutional Law Civil Procedure Interim Injunctions Freedom of Assembly Public Order Defiance Campaign

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Attorney General

Applicant

Forum for Democratic Change (FDC)

Respondent

Col. (Rtd) Dr. Kizza Besigye

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Constitutional Application / Interim Order

  1. 1 Whether an interim order should be issued restraining the respondents from engaging in demonstrations, processions, public meetings, or media campaigns in furtherance of the 'defiance campaign' pending determination of the main application.
  2. 2 Whether proceedings in related High Court and Magistrates Court matters should be stayed pending the outcome of the main constitutional application.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had demonstrated sufficient grounds for the issuance of interim orders to restrain the respondents from engaging in the defiance campaign and related activities, as such actions could undermine public order and the administration of justice. The court exercised its discretion to preserve the status quo and prevent possible irreparable harm pending the hearing and determination of the main constitutional application. The court also found it necessary to stay proceedings in related matters before the High Court and Magistrates Court to avoid conflicting decisions and ensure orderly administration of justice.

Court Disposition

interim orders granted

Orders

  • An interim order is issued restraining the respondents, their agents, officials, supporters, or any person acting under their authority from engaging in demonstrations, processions, public meetings, media campaigns, or pronouncements in furtherance of the defiance campaign pending determination of Constitutional...
  • An interim order is issued staying the respondents and their associates from conducting any defiance campaign pending the hearing and determination of the main application for temporary injunction in Constitutional Application No. 017 of 2016.