[2006] UGHC 27

[2006] UGHC 27

The court held that since the suit was filed after SI 80 of 2000 came into force, the law applies to the issues raised in it. The fact that the claim survived and was entertained up to judgment means the applicants are entitled to benefit from the regime set out in SI 80 of 2000, even if only as a guide....

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2006] UGHC 27
Parties
Applicant: Henry Waibale & 2 Ors; Respondent: Attorney General
Court
High Court of Uganda
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Number
Miscellaneous Application No 582 of 2005
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Cause / Ruling
Outcome
Application allowed. The claims of the applicants/plaintiffs are to be determined under SI 80 of 2000 and Article 254 of the Constitution.
Legal Topics
Pension Entitlements, Retrospective Application of Law, Public Officer Rights
Source Language
en
Constitutional Law Civil Procedure Pension Entitlements Retrospective Application of Law Public Officer Rights

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Henry Waibale & 2 Ors

Applicant

Attorney General

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Cause / Ruling

  1. 1 Whether Statutory Instrument 80 of 2000 applies to respondents who retired before its commencement.
  2. 2 Whether the applicants/plaintiffs can benefit from the regime set out in SI 80 of 2000.
  3. 3 Whether Article 254 of the Constitution guarantees pension rights for public officers whose pensions remain unpaid.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that since the suit was filed after SI 80 of 2000 came into force, the law applies to the issues raised in it. The fact that the claim survived and was entertained up to judgment means the applicants are entitled to benefit from the regime set out in SI 80 of 2000, even if only as a guide. Furthermore, Article 254 of the Constitution guarantees the pension rights of public officers, and if unpaid, they can claim it. Therefore, the law in question should be used in determining the claims of the applicants/plaintiffs, regardless of their retirement date.

Court Disposition

Application allowed. The claims of the applicants/plaintiffs are to be determined under SI 80 of 2000 and Article 254 of the Constitution.

Orders

  • The claims of the applicants/plaintiffs shall be determined using the provisions of SI 80 of 2000 and Article 254 of the Constitution.