[2021] UGSC 2

[2021] UGSC 2

The Supreme Court found that the application raised substantially important points of law that warranted the grant of an interim stay of execution. Exercising its discretion under Rule 2(2) of the Supreme Court Rules, the Court determined that it was just and equitable to preserve the status quo by staying the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] UGSC 2
Parties
Applicant: Attorney General; Applicant: Director of Public Prosecutions; Respondent: Bob Kasango
Court
Supreme Court of Uganda
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Number
Constitutional Application 2 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Application / Ruling on Ex Parte Interim Stay Application
Outcome
application allowed; interim stay of execution granted
Judges
Owiny-Dollo, CJ, Arach-Amoko, JSC, Opio-Aweri, JSC, Mugamba, JSC, Muhanguzi, JSC
Legal Topics
Stay of Execution, Interim Orders, Constitutional Petitions
Source Language
en
Constitutional Law Civil Procedure Stay of Execution Interim Orders Constitutional Petitions

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Attorney General

Applicant

Director of Public Prosecutions

Applicant

Bob Kasango

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Constitutional Application / Ruling on Ex Parte Interim Stay Application

  1. 1 Whether the applicants are entitled to an interim stay of execution of the orders of the Constitutional Court pending determination of the substantive application for stay.
  2. 2 Whether the matters raised in the application constitute substantially important points of law warranting the grant of an interim order.

Ratio Decidendi

The Supreme Court found that the application raised substantially important points of law that warranted the grant of an interim stay of execution. Exercising its discretion under Rule 2(2) of the Supreme Court Rules, the Court determined that it was just and equitable to preserve the status quo by staying the execution of the Constitutional Court's orders in Constitutional Petition No. 16 of 2016 dated 18th March, 2021. The interim order was granted to remain in force until the disposal of the substantive application for stay of execution or any other order of the Court. The Court also directed that costs would be in the cause.

Court Disposition

application allowed; interim stay of execution granted

Orders

  • An interim order is granted staying execution of the orders of the Constitutional Court in Constitutional Petition No. 16 of 2016 dated 18th March, 2021.
  • The interim order shall remain in force until the disposal of Constitutional Application No. 1 of 2021 for stay of execution or any other order of the Supreme Court.