[2021] UGSC 1

[2021] UGSC 1

The Supreme Court found that the applicant had demonstrated sufficient grounds for the grant of an interim stay of execution, as there was a substantive application pending and a real risk of execution before its determination. The court held that it was in the interest of justice to preserve the status quo and...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] UGSC 1
Parties
Applicant: Attorney General; Respondent: Ssejemba Israel
Court
Supreme Court of Uganda
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Number
Constitutional Application 10 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Application / Interim Stay of Execution Pending Determination of Substantive Application
Outcome
interim stay of execution granted pending determination of substantive application
Judges
Opio Aweri, JSC, Tuhaise, JSC, Mike Chibita, JSC
Legal Topics
Right to Appeal, Right to Fair Hearing, Interim Stay of Execution, Small Claims Procedure
Source Language
en
Constitutional Law Civil Procedure Right to Appeal Right to Fair Hearing Interim Stay of Execution Small Claims Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Attorney General

Applicant

Ssejemba Israel

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Constitutional Application / Interim Stay of Execution Pending Determination of Substantive Application

  1. 1 Whether an interim stay of execution of the Constitutional Court's decision should be granted pending determination of the substantive application.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant has demonstrated sufficient grounds for the grant of an interim stay of execution.

Ratio Decidendi

The Supreme Court found that the applicant had demonstrated sufficient grounds for the grant of an interim stay of execution, as there was a substantive application pending and a real risk of execution before its determination. The court held that it was in the interest of justice to preserve the status quo and prevent possible prejudice to the applicant. The court was also satisfied that the respondent would not suffer prejudice as a result of the interim stay. Accordingly, the interim order for stay of execution of the Constitutional Court's judgment and declarations was granted pending the final disposal of the substantive application, with the order to remain in force for three months...

Court Disposition

interim stay of execution granted pending determination of substantive application

Orders

  • An interim stay of execution of the decision of the Constitutional Court in Petition No. 37 of 2014 is granted pending final disposal of the substantive application.
  • The interim order shall stay in force for three months or until further orders are given in the substantive application.