[1995] ACHPR 1

[1995] ACHPR 1

The Commission determined that, since the applicant failed to respond to its inquiries and the detained person had been released, there was no longer any interest in pursuing the communication. Accordingly, the Commission exercised its discretion to close the file, as the applicant demonstrated no intention to...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[1995] ACHPR 1
Parties
Applicant: Maria Baes; Respondent: State of Zaire
Court
African Commission on Human and Peoples Rights
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Number
Communication 31 of 1989
Procedural Posture
Public International Law / Decision
Outcome
file_closed
Legal Topics
Detention Without Charge, Political Detention, African Charter Rights, Article 6, Article 7
Source Language
en
Public International Law Detention Without Charge Political Detention African Charter Rights Article 6 Article 7

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Maria Baes

Applicant

State of Zaire

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Public International Law / Decision

  1. 1 Whether the detention of Dr. Shambuyi Naiadia Kandola without charge violated Articles 6 and 7 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights.
  2. 2 Whether the Commission should proceed with the communication in light of the applicant's lack of interest.

Ratio Decidendi

The Commission determined that, since the applicant failed to respond to its inquiries and the detained person had been released, there was no longer any interest in pursuing the communication. Accordingly, the Commission exercised its discretion to close the file, as the applicant demonstrated no intention to proceed. The merits of the alleged violations were not adjudicated due to the lack of engagement from the applicant.

Court Disposition

file_closed

Orders

  • The file is closed as the applicant has shown no interest in proceeding with the case.