[2003] UGHC 48

[2003] UGHC 48

The applicant failed to establish a prima facie case with any probability of success in the main suit. The property in question is registered in the name of the first respondent, and there is no evidence that the second respondent owns or possesses it. The purported will relied upon by the applicant is invalid and...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2003] UGHC 48
Parties
Applicant: Imelda Gertrude Basudde Nalongo; Respondent: Tereza Mwewulize; Respondent: John Tibyasa Matovu
Court
High Court of Uganda
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Judgment Date
28 August 2003
Case Number
Misc. Application No. 0402 of 2003.
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling
Outcome
application dismissed
Legal Topics
Temporary Injunction, Matrimonial Home Rights, Registered Title Ownership, Succession and Administration
Source Language
english
Land and Property Civil Procedure Temporary Injunction Matrimonial Home Rights Registered Title Ownership Succession and Administration

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 6 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Imelda Gertrude Basudde Nalongo

Applicant

Tereza Mwewulize

Respondent

John Tibyasa Matovu

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to a temporary injunction restraining the respondents from evicting her from Kibuga Block 1, plot 558.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant has a prima facie case with a probability of success in the main suit regarding her claim to the property as a matrimonial home.
  3. 3 Whether the applicant would suffer irreparable injury if the injunction is not granted.

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant failed to establish a prima facie case with any probability of success in the main suit. The property in question is registered in the name of the first respondent, and there is no evidence that the second respondent owns or possesses it. The purported will relied upon by the applicant is invalid and was never probated, meaning the late Sarah Ndagire died intestate. The applicant's claim that the property is her matrimonial home has no legal basis, as her rights as a wife are personal and do not extend against the registered proprietor. Consequently, the applicant is not entitled to a temporary injunction, and the application is dismissed without consideration of irreparable...

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application for a temporary injunction is dismissed.
  • Costs to abide by the outcome of the main cause.