[1993] UGSC 9

[1993] UGSC 9

The Supreme Court held that the prosecution had proved beyond reasonable doubt that the appellant participated in the robbery with violence and that a deadly weapon was used. The evidence of the complainants and other witnesses was credible and corroborated. The defence was found to be false and unsupported by any...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[1993] UGSC 9
Parties
Appellant: Benon Musasizi; Respondent: Uganda
Court
Supreme Court of Uganda
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Number
Criminal Appeal 19 of 1991
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence From the High Court
Outcome
appeal dismissed; conviction and sentence upheld
Judges
Manyindo, DCJ, Odoki, JSC, Oder, JSC
Legal Topics
Robbery With Violence, Use of Deadly Weapon, Firearm Expert Evidence, Burden of Proof
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Robbery With Violence Use of Deadly Weapon Firearm Expert Evidence Burden of Proof

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Benon Musasizi

Appellant

Uganda

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence From the High Court

  1. 1 Whether the prosecution proved beyond reasonable doubt that the appellant committed robbery with violence as charged.
  2. 2 Whether the prosecution proved that a deadly weapon was used in the commission of the robbery.

Ratio Decidendi

The Supreme Court held that the prosecution had proved beyond reasonable doubt that the appellant participated in the robbery with violence and that a deadly weapon was used. The evidence of the complainants and other witnesses was credible and corroborated. The defence was found to be false and unsupported by any independent evidence. The gun recovered from the appellant was examined by a police officer with 20 years of experience, who confirmed it was capable of firing. The Court found that it is not necessary for the gun to be fired during the robbery or test-fired subsequently; it is sufficient if expert evidence establishes that the gun is capable of discharging a bullet. The police...

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed; conviction and sentence upheld

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed.
  • The conviction and sentence of death on count 1 are upheld.