[2019] UGHRC 3
The Tribunal found that the Complainant was detained for 13 days, with only 2 days being lawful under Article 23(4)(b) of the Constitution. The remaining 11 days constituted unlawful detention, violating the Complainant's right to personal liberty. The Respondent's agents acted in the course of their employment, making the Attorney General vicariously liable for the violation. The Complainant was entitled to compensation for the infringement of his constitutional rights, and the Tribunal awarded general damages accordingly.
- Citation
- [2019] UGHRC 3
- Parties
- Applicant: Birungi Thomas; Respondent: Attorney General
- Court
- Uganda Human Rights Commission
- Jurisdiction
- Uganda
- Judgment Date
- 28 October 2019
- Case Number
- Complaint UHRC 13 of 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Human Rights Complaint / Final Decision
- Outcome
- complaint allowed
- Judges
- Meddie Mulumba - Commissioner
- Legal Topics
- Personal Liberty, Unlawful Detention, Vicarious Liability, Compensation for Rights Violation
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Birungi Thomas
Applicant
Attorney General
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Human Rights Complaint / Final Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Complainant's right to personal liberty was violated by the Respondent's agents.
- 2 Whether the Respondent is vicariously liable for the acts of its agents.
- 3 Whether there are any remedies available to the Complainant.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the Complainant was detained for 13 days, with only 2 days being lawful under Article 23(4)(b) of the Constitution. The remaining 11 days constituted unlawful detention, violating the Complainant's right to personal liberty. The Respondent's agents acted in the course of their employment, making the Attorney General vicariously liable for the violation. The Complainant was entitled to compensation for the infringement of his constitutional rights, and the Tribunal awarded general damages accordingly.
Court Disposition
complaint allowed
Orders
- The complaint is allowed.
- The Respondent is ordered to pay to the Complainant a sum of UGX 2,200,000 as compensation for the violation of his right to personal liberty as protected under Article 23(4)(b) of the Constitution.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment