[2017] UGCommC 248
The court found that the applicants were effectively served with summons to file a defence, as service on a director or principal officer of a corporation is deemed effective under the Civil Procedure Rules. The process server's affidavit and the acknowledgment of receipt by the 2nd applicant, who was a director,...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2017] UGCommC 248
- Parties
- Applicant: Bugiri High School Ltd; Applicant: Basalirwa Moses; Applicant: Basalirwa Edith; Respondent: DFCU Bank Limited
- Court
- Commercial Court of Uganda
- Jurisdiction
- Uganda
- Judgment Date
- 2 November 2017
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Application No. 984 of 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application to Set Aside Default Judgment
- Outcome
- application dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Setting Aside Default Judgment, Service of Process, Loan Recovery, Corporate Directors Liability
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bugiri High School Ltd
Applicant
Basalirwa Moses
Applicant
Basalirwa Edith
Applicant
DFCU Bank Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application to Set Aside Default Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants were effectively served with summons to file a defence.
- 2 Whether there was sufficient cause preventing the applicants from appearing when the suit was called for hearing.
- 3 Whether the default judgment should be set aside and leave to defend granted.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicants were effectively served with summons to file a defence, as service on a director or principal officer of a corporation is deemed effective under the Civil Procedure Rules. The process server's affidavit and the acknowledgment of receipt by the 2nd applicant, who was a director, satisfied the requirements for proper service. The applicants failed to provide evidence that the 2nd applicant was not a director or that he was not authorized to receive service. Furthermore, the applicants did not demonstrate any sufficient cause, such as illness, mistake, or ignorance of procedure, that prevented them from appearing when the suit was called for hearing. As...
Court Disposition
application dismissed with costs
Orders
- The application to set aside the default judgment is dismissed.
- The applicants shall pay the costs of this application.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment