[2019] UGHRC 26
The Tribunal found that the applicant was detained for 49 days, with 47 days constituting illegal detention beyond the constitutional limit of 48 hours, violating his right to personal liberty. The applicant was also subjected to torture and cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment by State agents, as corroborated by witness testimony and consistent with the definition under international and domestic law. The respondent, as the representative of the State, is vicariously liable for these violations. The Tribunal applied relevant precedents to assess compensation, adjusting for the current value of money and the seriousness of the violations, especially the non-derogable right to freedom...
- Citation
- [2019] UGHRC 26
- Parties
- Applicant: Businge John; Respondent: Attorney General
- Court
- Uganda Human Rights Commission
- Jurisdiction
- Uganda
- Judgment Date
- 1 April 2019
- Case Number
- Complaint No: UHRC/FPT/45/2011
- Procedural Posture
- Human Rights Complaint / Final Decision
- Outcome
- complaint allowed
- Judges
- Dr. Katebalirwe Amooti Wa Irumba - Commissioner
- Legal Topics
- Torture and Cruel Inhuman Treatment, Illegal Detention, Vicarious Liability, Compensation for Rights Violation
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Businge John
Applicant
Attorney General
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Human Rights Complaint / Final Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant's right of freedom from torture or cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment was violated by State agents.
- 2 Whether the applicant's right to personal liberty was violated by State agents.
- 3 Whether the respondent is liable for the violations.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the applicant was detained for 49 days, with 47 days constituting illegal detention beyond the constitutional limit of 48 hours, violating his right to personal liberty. The applicant was also subjected to torture and cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment by State agents, as corroborated by witness testimony and consistent with the definition under international and domestic law. The respondent, as the representative of the State, is vicariously liable for these violations. The Tribunal applied relevant precedents to assess compensation, adjusting for the current value of money and the seriousness of the violations, especially the non-derogable right to freedom...
Court Disposition
complaint allowed
Orders
- The complaint is wholly allowed.
- The respondent is ordered to pay the applicant a total sum of UGX 19,000,000, broken down as UGX 14,000,000 for violation of personal liberty and UGX 5,000,000 for violation of freedom from torture or cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment