[2017] ACHPR 1

[2017] ACHPR 1

The African Commission found that the applicant had not exhausted available local remedies in Tanzania as required by article 56 of the African Charter and Rule 114 of the Rules of Procedure. The failure to pursue domestic legal avenues rendered the communication inadmissible before the Commission. The exhaustion of...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] ACHPR 1
Parties
Applicant: Alberto T Capitao; Respondent: Tanzania
Court
African Commission on Human and Peoples Rights
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Number
Communication 53 of 1990
Procedural Posture
Public International Law / Admissibility
Outcome
communication declared inadmissible
Legal Topics
Exhaustion of Local Remedies, Admissibility of Communications, African Charter on Human and Peoples Rights
Source Language
en
Public International Law Exhaustion of Local Remedies Admissibility of Communications African Charter on Human and Peoples Rights

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Alberto T Capitao

Applicant

Tanzania

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Public International Law / Admissibility

  1. 1 Whether the applicant exhausted local remedies as required by article 56 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights.
  2. 2 Whether the communication is admissible before the African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights.

Ratio Decidendi

The African Commission found that the applicant had not exhausted available local remedies in Tanzania as required by article 56 of the African Charter and Rule 114 of the Rules of Procedure. The failure to pursue domestic legal avenues rendered the communication inadmissible before the Commission. The exhaustion of local remedies is a mandatory procedural requirement for admissibility, and its absence precludes consideration of the merits of the communication.

Court Disposition

communication declared inadmissible

Orders

  • The communication is declared inadmissible for failure to exhaust local remedies as required by article 56 of the Charter and Rule 114 of the Rules of Procedure.