[1995] ACHPR 3

[1995] ACHPR 3

The Commission determined that, due to the complainant's failure to respond to repeated inquiries regarding the continuation of the case after the detainee's release, there was no basis to proceed. The file was closed for loss of contact with the complainant, in accordance with the Commission's procedural rules.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[1995] ACHPR 3
Parties
Applicant: Committee for the Defense of Human Rights; Respondent: Federal Republic of Nigeria
Court
African Commission on Human and Peoples Rights
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Number
Communication 62 of 1991
Procedural Posture
Human Rights Communication / Decision
Outcome
file_closed_due_to_loss_of_contact
Legal Topics
Right to Liberty, Politically Motivated Detention, Due Process, Communication Admissibility
Source Language
en
Constitutional Law Right to Liberty Politically Motivated Detention Due Process Communication Admissibility

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Committee for the Defense of Human Rights

Applicant

Federal Republic of Nigeria

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Human Rights Communication / Decision

  1. 1 Whether the detention of the individual was politically motivated and violated human rights protections.
  2. 2 Whether the communication should be pursued in light of the complainant's lack of response.

Ratio Decidendi

The Commission determined that, due to the complainant's failure to respond to repeated inquiries regarding the continuation of the case after the detainee's release, there was no basis to proceed. The file was closed for loss of contact with the complainant, in accordance with the Commission's procedural rules.

Court Disposition

file_closed_due_to_loss_of_contact

Orders

  • The file is closed due to loss of contact with the complainant.