[1992] ACHPR 2

[1992] ACHPR 2

The African Commission determined that the communication did not allege any specific breaches of the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights. As a result, the file was closed in accordance with Article 56 of the Charter, which sets out admissibility criteria for communications. The Commission emphasized that...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[1992] ACHPR 2
Parties
Applicant: Centre for the Independence of Judges and Lawyers; Respondent: Algeria
Court
African Commission on Human and Peoples Rights
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Number
Communication 104 of 1993
Procedural Posture
Communication / Final Decision
Outcome
file_closed
Legal Topics
Human Rights Monitoring, General Political Situation, Charter Compliance
Source Language
en
Constitutional Law Human Rights Monitoring General Political Situation Charter Compliance

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Centre for the Independence of Judges and Lawyers

Applicant

Algeria

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Communication / Final Decision

  1. 1 Whether the communication alleges specific breaches of the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights.
  2. 2 Whether the communication meets the admissibility requirements under Article 56 of the Charter.

Ratio Decidendi

The African Commission determined that the communication did not allege any specific breaches of the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights. As a result, the file was closed in accordance with Article 56 of the Charter, which sets out admissibility criteria for communications. The Commission emphasized that general information or commentary on the political situation, without reference to concrete violations, does not meet the threshold for consideration under its mandate.

Court Disposition

file_closed

Orders

  • The file is closed as the communication does not allege specific breaches of the Charter.