[2006] UGCommC 47

[2006] UGCommC 47

The court found that the plaintiff had executed the contracted road works to the satisfaction of the defendant, as evidenced by the issuance of completion certificates and correspondence confirming the work. The defendant received all project funds, including the VAT component, from the African Development Bank and...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2006] UGCommC 47
Parties
Plaintiff: Chribson (U) Ltd; Defendant: Luwero District Local Government
Court
Commercial Court of Uganda
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Number
HCT-00-CC-CS 918 of 2004
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Judgment
Outcome
judgment for the plaintiff
Legal Topics
Breach of Contract, Contractual Liability, Special Damages, General Damages, Interest Awards
Source Language
en
Commercial and Corporate Civil Procedure Breach of Contract Contractual Liability Special Damages General Damages Interest Awards

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Chribson (U) Ltd

Plaintiff

Luwero District Local Government

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Suit / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the defendant is liable to make good the plaintiff's claim for unpaid contract sums and VAT component.
  2. 2 What remedies, if any, are available to the plaintiff.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiff had executed the contracted road works to the satisfaction of the defendant, as evidenced by the issuance of completion certificates and correspondence confirming the work. The defendant received all project funds, including the VAT component, from the African Development Bank and was responsible for making full payment to the plaintiff. The defendant's argument that liability rested with the African Development Bank was rejected, as the funds were disbursed to the defendant, who controlled the project account and entered into the contract with the plaintiff. The court held that the plaintiff was entitled to the outstanding contract sum, the unpaid VAT,...

Court Disposition

judgment for the plaintiff

Orders

  • Special damages of UGX 37,228,745 awarded to the plaintiff.
  • General damages of UGX 3,000,000 awarded to the plaintiff.