[2004] UGCommC 13

[2004] UGCommC 13

The court found that there was no contract of hire between the plaintiff and the defendant. The evidence showed that the lorry was delivered to the defendant's premises not for hire, but as security for an outstanding debt owed by the plaintiff and his wife. The oral testimonies of the plaintiff and his wife were...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2004] UGCommC 13
Parties
Plaintiff: Christopher Kisembo; Defendant: Global Distributors Ltd
Court
Commercial Court of Uganda
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Number
High Court Civil Suit No. 334 of 2002
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Judgment
Outcome
suit dismissed with costs to the defendant
Legal Topics
Contract of Hire, Pledge of Security, Debt Recovery, Agency Relationship
Source Language
en
Commercial and Corporate Civil Procedure Contract of Hire Pledge of Security Debt Recovery Agency Relationship

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Christopher Kisembo

Plaintiff

Global Distributors Ltd

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Suit / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff hired the lorry to the defendant as alleged.
  2. 2 Whether the defendant impounded the plaintiff's lorry.
  3. 3 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to the remedies sought.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that there was no contract of hire between the plaintiff and the defendant. The evidence showed that the lorry was delivered to the defendant's premises not for hire, but as security for an outstanding debt owed by the plaintiff and his wife. The oral testimonies of the plaintiff and his wife were inconsistent and contradicted by documentary evidence and the credible testimony of the defendant's witnesses. The court held that the defendant did not agree to hire the lorry, and instead impounded it to recover the outstanding debt. As the plaintiff's claim was based entirely on the alleged contract of hire, which was not proven to exist, the plaintiff was not entitled to any...

Court Disposition

suit dismissed with costs to the defendant

Orders

  • The plaintiff's suit is dismissed.
  • The plaintiff shall pay the costs of the suit to the defendant.