[2005] UGCommC 62

[2005] UGCommC 62

The court found that the claim for arrears prior to 11th January 2002 was time barred under Section 3(2) of the Civil Procedure and Limitation (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act. The admissible claim was for arrears within three years preceding the filing of the suit. Documentary evidence, including a letter from the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2005] UGCommC 62
Parties
Plaintiff: Deborah Namutebi; Plaintiff: The Administrator General (Administrators of the Estate of the late Stanley Kizza Kizito); Defendant: Kawempe Division
Court
Commercial Court of Uganda
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Number
HCT-00-CC-CS 15 of 2005
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Judgment
Outcome
judgment for the plaintiffs in part; claim prior to 11th January 2002 struck out as time barred.
Legal Topics
Arrears of Rent, Contractual Liability, Limitation Periods, Local Authority Management
Source Language
en
Land and Property Commercial and Corporate Arrears of Rent Contractual Liability Limitation Periods Local Authority Management

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Deborah Namutebi

Plaintiff

The Administrator General (Administrators of the Estate of the late Stanley Kizza Kizito)

Plaintiff

Kawempe Division

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Suit / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the claim or any part thereof is time barred under the applicable limitation statute.
  2. 2 Whether the plaintiffs are entitled to Shs.2,000,000.00 per month as claimed.
  3. 3 Whether the plaintiffs are entitled to the remedies sought, including arrears, interest, general damages, and costs.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the claim for arrears prior to 11th January 2002 was time barred under Section 3(2) of the Civil Procedure and Limitation (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act. The admissible claim was for arrears within three years preceding the filing of the suit. Documentary evidence, including a letter from the defendant, confirmed an agreement to pay Shs.2,000,000.00 per month to the plaintiffs. The defendant's contention of entitlement to only 30% of net collections was unsupported by evidence. The court awarded the plaintiffs Shs.72,000,000.00 for 36 months of arrears, interest at 20% per annum from the date of filing to judgment, and thereafter at court rate until payment in full....

Court Disposition

judgment for the plaintiffs in part; claim prior to 11th January 2002 struck out as time barred.

Orders

  • Defendant to pay Shs.72,000,000.00 to the plaintiffs as arrears of rent for 36 months up to the date of filing suit, less any amount already admitted and paid.
  • Interest at 20% per annum from the date of filing suit to the date of judgment, and thereafter at court rate until realization in full.