[1997] UGHC 3

[1997] UGHC 3

The court found that the primary objective is to prevent loss through deterioration, pilferage, or excessive storage charges on the seized goods, many of which are perishable. Both parties ultimately agreed on the necessity of sale, but disagreed on the mode. The court determined that sale by the applicants, under...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[1997] UGHC 3
Parties
Applicant: Danze Enterprises Ltd & 5 Others; Respondent: Commissioner General, Uganda Revenue Authority
Court
High Court of Uganda
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Number
Misc. Appl. No. 955 of 1997
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Sale and Inspection of Seized Goods Pending Main Suit
Outcome
application granted with detailed directions for sale and inspection of goods under court supervision
Legal Topics
Interlocutory Orders, Sale of Perishable Goods, Seizure of Goods, Court Supervision of Sale
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Commercial and Corporate Interlocutory Orders Sale of Perishable Goods Seizure of Goods Court Supervision of Sale

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Danze Enterprises Ltd & 5 Others

Applicant

Commissioner General, Uganda Revenue Authority

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Sale and Inspection of Seized Goods Pending Main Suit

  1. 1 Whether the court should order the release and sale of seized trade goods pending the determination of the main suit.
  2. 2 What is the appropriate mode of sale for the seized goods to preserve their value and mitigate loss.
  3. 3 Whether the applicants should be allowed to inspect the goods to assess damage.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the primary objective is to prevent loss through deterioration, pilferage, or excessive storage charges on the seized goods, many of which are perishable. Both parties ultimately agreed on the necessity of sale, but disagreed on the mode. The court determined that sale by the applicants, under strict court supervision and with the respondent's representatives present, would best preserve value, ensure transparency, and allow for proper identification of proceeds. The court ordered joint valuation, immediate commencement of sale within a set timeframe, and that proceeds be held in escrow pending the outcome of the main suit. The court declined to address substantive...

Court Disposition

application granted with detailed directions for sale and inspection of goods under court supervision

Orders

  • Respondent to avail the trade goods as listed in Annexture A of the supporting affidavit.
  • Joint valuation and inspection of goods by appointed surveyors/valuers from both parties within three weeks.