[2013] AfCHPR 122
The Court held that its previous decision was final and not subject to appeal in accordance with Article 28(2) of the Protocol. The Applicants' attempt to appeal was therefore inadmissible. Furthermore, even if the Applicants' submission was construed as an application for review under Article 28(3) of the Protocol,...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2013] AfCHPR 122
- Parties
- Applicant: Delta International Investments SA; Applicant: Mr. AGL De Lange; Applicant: Mrs. M. De Lange; Respondent: Republic of South Africa
- Court
- African Court on Human and Peoples Rights
- Jurisdiction
- Uganda
- Case Number
- Appeal No. 001-2012
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Ruling on Admissibility of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal struck out as inadmissible; matter concluded.
- Judges
- Akuffo P, Eno R, Guissè J, Kioko J, Niyungeko J, Orė J, Ouguergouz VP, Ramadhani J, Tambala J, Thompson J
- Legal Topics
- Jurisdiction of Regional Courts, Finality of Court Decisions, Right of Appeal
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Delta International Investments SA
Applicant
Mr. AGL De Lange
Applicant
Mrs. M. De Lange
Applicant
Republic of South Africa
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Ruling on Admissibility of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights has jurisdiction to entertain an appeal against its own final decision.
- 2 Whether the Applicants' letter could be considered as an application for review under Article 28(3) of the Protocol.
- 3 Whether any new evidence was provided to warrant a review of the Court's earlier decision.
Ratio Decidendi
The Court held that its previous decision was final and not subject to appeal in accordance with Article 28(2) of the Protocol. The Applicants' attempt to appeal was therefore inadmissible. Furthermore, even if the Applicants' submission was construed as an application for review under Article 28(3) of the Protocol, the Court found that no new evidence had been presented to justify a review. As a result, the Court unanimously ruled that the 'Appeal' was not admissible and struck out the matter.
Court Disposition
Appeal struck out as inadmissible; matter concluded.
Orders
- The 'Appeal' submitted by Delta International Investments SA, Mr. AGL De Lange and Mrs. M. De Lange is not admissible.
- The matter is struck out.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
32 paragraphs
$\frac{001}{2012}$ $\frac{001}{2013}$ $\frac{001}{2013}$ $\frac{000179 - 000175}{00}$
**AFRICAN UNION**
الاتحاد الأقريقي
**UNION AFRICAINE**
**UNIÃO AFRICANA**
#### AFRICAN COURT ON HUMAN AND PEOPLES' RIGHTS
COUR AFRICAINE DES DROITS DE L'HOMME ET DES PEUPLES
## IN THE MATTER OF:
# DELTA INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENTS SA, MR. AGL DE LANGE AND MRS. M. DE LANGE
$V$ .
# THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA
Appeal No. 001/2012
**RULING**
The Court composed of : Sophia A. B. AKUFFO, President; Fatsah OUGUERGOUZ, Vice-President, G6rard NIYUNGEKO, Augustino S. L. RANIADHANI , Duncan TAMBALA, Elsie N. THOMPSON, Sylvain ORE, El Hadji GUISSE and Ben KIOKO, Judges ; and Robert ENO - Registrar;
ln the fVlatter of
# DELTA INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENTS SA, IMR AGL DE LANGE AND I\NRS DE LANGE
#### V
### THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA
After Deliberations,
renders the following Ruling
<sup>1</sup> By an application dated 4 February 2012, received at the Registry of the Court on 8 February 2012, Delta lnternational lnvestments SA, Mr. AGL De Lange and Mrs. De Lange (hereinafter referred to as "the Applicants"), seized the Court with a petition against the Republic of South Africa (hereinafter referred to as "the Respondent"), for alleged torture and violation of their rights to dignity, property,
information, privacy and discrimination, contrary to the South African Constitution and the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights (hereinafter referred to as "the Charter").
- 2 ln accordance with Article 22 of the Protocol to the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights on the Establishment of an African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights (the Protocol) and Rule B(2) of the Rules of Court (the Rules), Justice Bernard M. Ngoepe, member of the Court of South African nationality, recused himself. - The application was considered by the Court on 30 March 2012 at its 24th Ordinary Session. The Court decided that "pursuant to Articles 5(3) and 34(6) of the Protocol, it manifestly lacks jurisdiction to receive the application submitted by Delta lnternational lnvestments SA, Mr. AGL De Lange and Mrs. M. De Lange, against the Republic of South Africa, and the Application is accordingly struck out ..." 3 - By an 'Appeal' dated 16 August 2012, and received at the Registry on 12 September 2Q12, the Applicants purported to appeal against the decision of the Court, asserting, inter alia, that the Court had jurisdiction by virtue of relevant provisions of the South African Constitution, the United Nations Charter, the Charter and the Protocol to the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights on the Establishment of an African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights (hereinafter referred to as "the Protocol"). 4
- 5 ln addition, the Applicants argue that the Charter cannot be subservient to what they called "Administrative Protocol adopted twelve years later on 9 June 1998". - 6 The Court is of the view that the Applicants are not entitled to appeal against the earlier decision of the Court since the earlier decision is "final and not subject to appeal" in the light of the provisions of Article 28 (2) of the Protocol. - 7 Even if the Court were to consider the Applicants' letter of 16 August, 2012 as an application for review within the meaning of Article 28(3) of the Protocol, the Court is of the view that the application does not provide any new evidence to warrant a review. - B. For these reasons
THE COURT, Unanimously
Rules that, pursuant to Article 2B(2) of the Protocol, the 'Appeal' submitted by Delta lnternational lnvestments SA, |\/r. AGL De Lange and N/rs. De Lange in not admissible' Accordingly, the matter is struck out.
Done in Arusha, Tanzania, this Fifteenth day of March of the year Two Thousand and Thirteen, in English and French, the English text being authoritative. CN HUMAN
COUN
ANIZ
Signed:
Justice Sophia A. B. AKUFFO, President
Robert ENO, Registrar.