[2013] AfCHPR 122

[2013] AfCHPR 122

The Court held that its previous decision was final and not subject to appeal in accordance with Article 28(2) of the Protocol. The Applicants' attempt to appeal was therefore inadmissible. Furthermore, even if the Applicants' submission was construed as an application for review under Article 28(3) of the Protocol,...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2013] AfCHPR 122
Parties
Applicant: Delta International Investments SA; Applicant: Mr. AGL De Lange; Applicant: Mrs. M. De Lange; Respondent: Republic of South Africa
Court
African Court on Human and Peoples Rights
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Number
Appeal No. 001-2012
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Ruling on Admissibility of Appeal
Outcome
Appeal struck out as inadmissible; matter concluded.
Judges
Akuffo P, Eno R, Guissè J, Kioko J, Niyungeko J, Orė J, Ouguergouz VP, Ramadhani J, Tambala J, Thompson J
Legal Topics
Jurisdiction of Regional Courts, Finality of Court Decisions, Right of Appeal
Source Language
en
Administrative Law Constitutional Law Jurisdiction of Regional Courts Finality of Court Decisions Right of Appeal

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Delta International Investments SA

Applicant

Mr. AGL De Lange

Applicant

Mrs. M. De Lange

Applicant

Republic of South Africa

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Ruling on Admissibility of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights has jurisdiction to entertain an appeal against its own final decision.
  2. 2 Whether the Applicants' letter could be considered as an application for review under Article 28(3) of the Protocol.
  3. 3 Whether any new evidence was provided to warrant a review of the Court's earlier decision.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court held that its previous decision was final and not subject to appeal in accordance with Article 28(2) of the Protocol. The Applicants' attempt to appeal was therefore inadmissible. Furthermore, even if the Applicants' submission was construed as an application for review under Article 28(3) of the Protocol, the Court found that no new evidence had been presented to justify a review. As a result, the Court unanimously ruled that the 'Appeal' was not admissible and struck out the matter.

Court Disposition

Appeal struck out as inadmissible; matter concluded.

Orders

  • The 'Appeal' submitted by Delta International Investments SA, Mr. AGL De Lange and Mrs. M. De Lange is not admissible.
  • The matter is struck out.