[2001] UGHC 90

[2001] UGHC 90

The court held that the learned magistrate erred in upholding substituted service by newspaper without evidence that personal service on the appellant, his agent, or a family member was attempted and failed. The defect in the Notice of Motion was not fatal, as the accompanying affidavit disclosed non-service as the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2001] UGHC 90
Parties
Appellant: Dominiko Ssalongo; Respondent: Ekoyasi Kiwanuka
Court
High Court of Uganda
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Number
Civil Appeal No.67 of 1998
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment
Outcome
appeal_allowed
Legal Topics
Service of Process, Setting Aside Ex Parte Judgment, Notice of Motion Requirements
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Service of Process Setting Aside Ex Parte Judgment Notice of Motion Requirements

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Dominiko Ssalongo

Appellant

Ekoyasi Kiwanuka

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether substituted service by newspaper was proper when personal service was not attempted.
  2. 2 Whether the Notice of Motion was fatally defective for citing grounds outside Order 9 rule 24 of the CPR.
  3. 3 Whether the appellant was duly served with court summons before the ex parte judgment.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the learned magistrate erred in upholding substituted service by newspaper without evidence that personal service on the appellant, his agent, or a family member was attempted and failed. The defect in the Notice of Motion was not fatal, as the accompanying affidavit disclosed non-service as the ground for the application. The magistrate failed to satisfy himself that substituted service was justified, and thus the ex parte judgment and related orders were set aside. The appellant was granted leave to defend the suit, and costs were to abide the outcome of the main suit.

Court Disposition

appeal_allowed

Orders

  • The magistrate's ruling dated 5th August 1998 is set aside forthwith.
  • The ex parte judgment dated 26th February 1998 and any decree made thereunder, together with related proceedings, are set aside.