[2023] UGHCLD 441

[2023] UGHCLD 441

The court found that while the applicant's compensation sum of UGX 119,154,737 was indeed part of the total compensation deposited in court by the respondent, the procedure adopted by the applicant—filing repeated applications—was improper. The court emphasized that the correct approach for the applicant to secure...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] UGHCLD 441
Parties
Applicant: Donozio Musisi Sekyaaya; Respondent: Uganda National Roads Authority
Court
HC: Land Division (Uganda)
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Number
Miscellaneous Cause 330 of 2023
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Cause / Ruling on Application for Confirmation and Payment of Compensation
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
Naluzze Aisha Batala, J
Legal Topics
Compulsory Acquisition, Compensation Disputes, Court Deposit Procedure, Kibanja Rights
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Compulsory Acquisition Compensation Disputes Court Deposit Procedure Kibanja Rights

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Donozio Musisi Sekyaaya

Applicant

Uganda National Roads Authority

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Cause / Ruling on Application for Confirmation and Payment of Compensation

  1. 1 Whether the applicant's compensation sum of UGX 119,154,737 formed part of the total compensation sum of UGX 723,694,720 deposited in court by the respondent.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to an order for payment of the compensation sum from the monies deposited in court.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that while the applicant's compensation sum of UGX 119,154,737 was indeed part of the total compensation deposited in court by the respondent, the procedure adopted by the applicant—filing repeated applications—was improper. The court emphasized that the correct approach for the applicant to secure his compensation is to file an ordinary suit against all relevant parties, allowing the court to determine all questions of entitlement on their merits. The court further held that continued applications on the same subject matter amount to forum shopping and abuse of court process. As such, the application was dismissed for lack of merit, with no order as to costs.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application is dismissed for lack of merit.
  • No order as to costs.