[2025] UGHCLD 84

[2025] UGHCLD 84

The court found that since the applicant, Edward Ssenteza, expressly distanced himself from the application filed by his former advocates and the said advocates had withdrawn from representing him, the application for a hearing date in MA No. 1662 of 2024 was rendered untenable. The court therefore dismissed the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2025] UGHCLD 84
Parties
Applicant: Edward Ssenteza; Respondent: Cyril Kambarage Chigange; Respondent: Karim Hirji; Respondent: Anil Damani
Court
HC: Land Division (Uganda)
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Number
Miscellaneous Application No. 1662 of 2024
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Hearing Date
Outcome
application dismissed as untenable
Judges
Kazaarwe, J
Legal Topics
Dismissal of Application, Representation and Withdrawal, Counter Claims
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Dismissal of Application Representation and Withdrawal Counter Claims

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Edward Ssenteza

Applicant

Cyril Kambarage Chigange

Respondent

Karim Hirji

Respondent

Anil Damani

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Hearing Date

  1. 1 Whether the application for a hearing date in MA No. 1662 of 2024 is tenable after the main suit was dismissed and the applicant's advocate withdrew representation.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that since the applicant, Edward Ssenteza, expressly distanced himself from the application filed by his former advocates and the said advocates had withdrawn from representing him, the application for a hearing date in MA No. 1662 of 2024 was rendered untenable. The court therefore dismissed the application, noting that there was no basis to proceed with a hearing for an application that the applicant no longer supported or owned. No order as to costs was made, reflecting the abandonment and lack of opposition.

Court Disposition

application dismissed as untenable

Orders

  • MA No. 1662 of 2024 is dismissed with no order as to costs.