[1990] ACHPR 6

[1990] ACHPR 6

The African Commission declined jurisdiction and declared the communication inadmissible because both respondent states, USA and Haiti, are not parties to the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights. The Commission is empowered to consider communications only against states that have ratified the Charter. As...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[1990] ACHPR 6
Parties
Applicant: Georges Eugene; Respondent: USA; Respondent: Haiti
Court
African Commission on Human and Peoples Rights
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Number
Communication 37 of 1990
Procedural Posture
Communication / Admissibility
Outcome
communication declared inadmissible
Legal Topics
Admissibility of Communications, Jurisdiction of Commission, State Party Requirement
Source Language
en
Public International Law Admissibility of Communications Jurisdiction of Commission State Party Requirement

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Georges Eugene

Applicant

USA

Respondent

Haiti

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Communication / Admissibility

  1. 1 Whether the African Commission has jurisdiction over communications against states that are not parties to the African Charter.
  2. 2 Whether the communication meets the admissibility requirements under the Rules of Procedure.

Ratio Decidendi

The African Commission declined jurisdiction and declared the communication inadmissible because both respondent states, USA and Haiti, are not parties to the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights. The Commission is empowered to consider communications only against states that have ratified the Charter. As neither USA nor Haiti is a party, the communication fails the admissibility test under Article 101 of the Rules of Procedure.

Court Disposition

communication declared inadmissible

Orders

  • The communication is declared inadmissible under Article 101 of the Rules of Procedure.