[2006] UGCommC 64

[2006] UGCommC 64

The court held that Section 92 of the Civil Procedure Act is only applicable where a decree has been varied or reversed, which was not the case here. Non-performance of a decree does not amount to its variation, and the applicant's claim for additional rent is a substantive matter that cannot be granted through the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2006] UGCommC 64
Parties
Applicant: Francis Jaya Salongo; Respondent: Mukono District Council; Respondent: Kimenyede Local Council 111
Court
Commercial Court of Uganda
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Number
HCT-00-CC-MA 496 of 2006
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling
Outcome
application dismissed
Legal Topics
Consent Decree Enforcement, Arrears of Rent, Non Performance of Judgment, Variation of Decree
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Consent Decree Enforcement Arrears of Rent Non Performance of Judgment Variation of Decree

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Francis Jaya Salongo

Applicant

Mukono District Council

Respondent

Kimenyede Local Council 111

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to additional rent for the period after the consent decree until possession is handed over.
  2. 2 Whether Section 92 of the Civil Procedure Act applies where a decree has not been varied or reversed.
  3. 3 Whether non-performance of a decree constitutes variation of the decree.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that Section 92 of the Civil Procedure Act is only applicable where a decree has been varied or reversed, which was not the case here. Non-performance of a decree does not amount to its variation, and the applicant's claim for additional rent is a substantive matter that cannot be granted through the present application. The appropriate remedy for non-performance is enforcement of the decree, not variation or restitution under Section 92. The application for additional rent is therefore dismissed, as the relief sought is not consequential upon any variation or reversal of the original decree.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • This part of the application is dismissed with costs to respondent no.2.