[2001] UGHC 100

[2001] UGHC 100

The court found that the plaintiff was arrested and detained by UPDF soldiers, who were acting as servants of the government and within the scope of their duties. The plaintiff established a prima facie case of false imprisonment and unlawful arrest, shifting the burden to the defendant, who failed to justify the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2001] UGHC 100
Parties
Plaintiff: Fred Hereri; Defendant: Attorney General
Court
High Court of Uganda
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Number
Civil Suit No.42 of 1995
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Judgment
Outcome
Judgment for the plaintiff.
Legal Topics
False Imprisonment, Unlawful Arrest, Vicarious Liability, Damages Assessment
Source Language
en
Tort Law Civil Procedure False Imprisonment Unlawful Arrest Vicarious Liability Damages Assessment

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Fred Hereri

Plaintiff

Attorney General

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Suit / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff was unlawfully arrested and illegally detained at Bihanga barracks by UPDF soldiers.
  2. 2 Whether the soldiers were acting within the scope of their duties, rendering the defendant vicariously liable.
  3. 3 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to the remedies sought.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiff was arrested and detained by UPDF soldiers, who were acting as servants of the government and within the scope of their duties. The plaintiff established a prima facie case of false imprisonment and unlawful arrest, shifting the burden to the defendant, who failed to justify the detention. The court held that the arrest and imprisonment were unlawful and false, and that the government was vicariously liable. The plaintiff was entitled to special damages for money extorted by the soldiers, general damages for the suffering and loss endured, and exemplary damages due to the oppressive and unconstitutional conduct of the soldiers. The court rejected the...

Court Disposition

Judgment for the plaintiff.

Orders

  • The plaintiff is awarded UGX 5,000 as special damages.
  • The plaintiff is awarded UGX 3,500,000 as general damages.