[2023] UGHCLD 442

[2023] UGHCLD 442

The court found that the plaintiff's pleadings did not disclose a cause of action against either defendant. The plaintiff purchased the suit land from Nantongo Diana Namuddu, not from the 1st defendant, who was the registered proprietor and not party to the transaction. The plaintiff's rights, if any, could only be...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] UGHCLD 442
Parties
Plaintiff: Gitta Alex; Defendant: Kawuki Abdul; Defendant: Commissioner Land Registration
Court
HC: Land Division (Uganda)
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Number
Civil Suit 588 of 2023
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Outcome
plaint struck out for non-disclosure of cause of action
Judges
Asiimwe, J
Legal Topics
Cause of Action, Land Registration, Striking Out Pleadings, Trespass, Remedies, Statutory Duties
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Cause of Action Land Registration Striking Out Pleadings Trespass Remedies Statutory Duties

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Gitta Alex

Plaintiff

Kawuki Abdul

Defendant

Commissioner Land Registration

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Suit / Ruling on Preliminary Objection

  1. 1 Whether the plaint discloses a cause of action against the defendants.
  2. 2 Whether the plaintiff has a right enforceable against the defendants based on the pleaded facts.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiff's pleadings did not disclose a cause of action against either defendant. The plaintiff purchased the suit land from Nantongo Diana Namuddu, not from the 1st defendant, who was the registered proprietor and not party to the transaction. The plaintiff's rights, if any, could only be enforced against Nantongo Diana Namuddu. The 2nd defendant, as a statutory authority, acted upon the request of the registered proprietor. Since the plaint did not show any right of the plaintiff violated by the defendants, nor any liability on their part, the suit was struck out for non-disclosure of a cause of action.

Court Disposition

plaint struck out for non-disclosure of cause of action

Orders

  • The plaint is struck out for non-disclosure of a cause of action.
  • Costs awarded to the 1st defendant.