[2006] UGCommC 62

[2006] UGCommC 62

The court held that the suit is not time barred because the cause of action accrued in 1999 when a demand for payment was made and ignored by the defendants, not in 1995 when the last withdrawal occurred. Additionally, the defendants' alleged acknowledgement of the debt in 1999, as pleaded by the plaintiffs, invokes...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2006] UGCommC 62
Parties
Plaintiff: Greenland Bank (In Liquidation); Defendant: Dr. Apuuli Kihumuro; Defendant: Mrs. Margaret Kihumuro
Court
Commercial Court of Uganda
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Number
HCT-00-CC-CS 790 of 2003
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Outcome
preliminary objection overruled; suit to proceed
Legal Topics
Limitation Periods, Bank Debt Recovery, Acknowledgement of Debt
Source Language
en
Banking and Finance Civil Procedure Limitation Periods Bank Debt Recovery Acknowledgement of Debt

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Greenland Bank (In Liquidation)

Plaintiff

Dr. Apuuli Kihumuro

Defendant

Mrs. Margaret Kihumuro

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Suit / Ruling on Preliminary Objection

  1. 1 Whether the suit is time barred under the Limitation Act.
  2. 2 Whether the cause of action accrued at the time of last withdrawal or upon demand for payment.
  3. 3 Whether the defendants' alleged acknowledgement of debt affects the limitation period.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the suit is not time barred because the cause of action accrued in 1999 when a demand for payment was made and ignored by the defendants, not in 1995 when the last withdrawal occurred. Additionally, the defendants' alleged acknowledgement of the debt in 1999, as pleaded by the plaintiffs, invokes Section 24 of the Limitation Act, which resets the limitation period to the date of acknowledgement. The pleadings raise a triable issue regarding the acknowledgement of debt, which must be investigated. Therefore, the preliminary objection is overruled and the case shall proceed to scheduling and hearing.

Court Disposition

preliminary objection overruled; suit to proceed

Orders

  • The objection is overruled.
  • The case shall proceed to scheduling and hearing.