[2005] UGCommC 6

[2005] UGCommC 6

The plaintiffs provided uncontroverted evidence that monthly salary deductions were credited to their savings accounts with the defendant cooperative society. Upon cessation of employment, they demanded payment of their savings, which was not paid except for a partial payment after suit was filed. The defendant...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2005] UGCommC 6
Parties
Plaintiff: G. W. Nsobya; Plaintiff: Edward Kato; Defendant: Uganda Posts and Telecommunications Employees Cooperative Savings and Credit Society Ltd
Court
Commercial Court of Uganda
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Number
HCT-00-CC-CS 708 of 2002
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Ex Parte Judgment
Outcome
judgment for the plaintiffs
Legal Topics
Employee Savings, Cooperative Societies, Salary Deductions, Interest on Savings, General Damages
Source Language
en
Commercial and Corporate Employment and Labour Employee Savings Cooperative Societies Salary Deductions Interest on Savings General Damages

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

G. W. Nsobya

Plaintiff

Edward Kato

Plaintiff

Uganda Posts and Telecommunications Employees Cooperative Savings and Credit Society Ltd

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Suit / Ex Parte Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiffs succeeded on a balance of probabilities to prove their claim.
  2. 2 Whether the plaintiffs are entitled to the sums claimed from their savings accounts.
  3. 3 Whether interest and general damages should be awarded to the plaintiffs.

Ratio Decidendi

The plaintiffs provided uncontroverted evidence that monthly salary deductions were credited to their savings accounts with the defendant cooperative society. Upon cessation of employment, they demanded payment of their savings, which was not paid except for a partial payment after suit was filed. The defendant failed to substantiate its defence regarding bye laws and resolutions, as no such documents were produced. The court found that the plaintiffs had proved their claims on a balance of probabilities and were entitled to the principal sums claimed. Interest was awarded at the court rate of 12% per annum from March 2001 until payment in full, as no contractual rate was established....

Court Disposition

judgment for the plaintiffs

Orders

  • Plaintiffs awarded principal sums of Shs.2,064,202.00 and Shs.3,188,807.00 respectively.
  • Interest at 12% per annum from March 2001 until payment in full.