[2006] UGCommC 2

[2006] UGCommC 2

The court found that the present suit was based on the same facts and cause of action as two previous suits between the same parties, both of which were dismissed by a competent court. Although the previous suits were dismissed on preliminary objections, the dismissals amounted to final decisions (decrees) that...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2006] UGCommC 2
Parties
Plaintiff: G W Wanendeya; Defendant: Stanbic Bank (U) Ltd
Court
Commercial Court of Uganda
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Number
HCT-00-CC-CS 486 of 2005
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Outcome
suit dismissed
Legal Topics
Res Judicata, Limitation Periods, Cause of Action, Caveats on Title, Special and General Damages
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Res Judicata Limitation Periods Cause of Action Caveats on Title Special and General Damages

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

G W Wanendeya

Plaintiff

Stanbic Bank (U) Ltd

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Suit / Ruling on Preliminary Objection

  1. 1 Whether the suit discloses a cause of action against the defendant.
  2. 2 Whether the suit is time barred under the Limitation Act.
  3. 3 Whether the suit is barred by res judicata due to previous suits between the same parties on the same subject matter.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the present suit was based on the same facts and cause of action as two previous suits between the same parties, both of which were dismissed by a competent court. Although the previous suits were dismissed on preliminary objections, the dismissals amounted to final decisions (decrees) that conclusively determined the rights of the parties. The plaintiff's remedy, if dissatisfied, was to appeal those decisions, not to file a fresh suit. The court applied Section 7 of the Civil Procedure Act and relevant case law, holding that the suit was barred by res judicata. The court also found that the cause of action was continuing with respect to detention of the certificate...

Court Disposition

suit dismissed

Orders

  • The suit is dismissed with costs to the defendant.