[2005] UGCommC 58

[2005] UGCommC 58

The court found that the plaintiff had proved, on a balance of probabilities, that the defendant company owed UGX 9,088,200 for petroleum products supplied on credit, as evidenced by requisition vouchers and financial statements. The defendant's failure to file a defence constituted a constructive admission of the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2005] UGCommC 58
Parties
Plaintiff: Haresh Dalwadi t/a Bugolobi Kobil Service Station; Defendant: A. A. G and Sons Transporters Ltd
Court
Commercial Court of Uganda
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Number
HCT-00-CC-CS 383 of 2003
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Ex Parte Formal Proof After Interlocutory Judgment Due to Non Filing of Defence
Outcome
Judgment for the plaintiff.
Legal Topics
Sale of Goods on Credit, Recovery of Debt, Ex Parte Judgment, General Damages
Source Language
en
Commercial and Corporate Civil Procedure Sale of Goods on Credit Recovery of Debt Ex Parte Judgment General Damages

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Haresh Dalwadi t/a Bugolobi Kobil Service Station

Plaintiff

A. A. G and Sons Transporters Ltd

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Suit / Ex Parte Formal Proof After Interlocutory Judgment Due to Non Filing of Defence

  1. 1 Whether the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff for unpaid petroleum products supplied on credit.
  2. 2 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to general damages for non-payment and inconvenience.
  3. 3 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to interest as claimed.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiff had proved, on a balance of probabilities, that the defendant company owed UGX 9,088,200 for petroleum products supplied on credit, as evidenced by requisition vouchers and financial statements. The defendant's failure to file a defence constituted a constructive admission of the plaintiff's claim. The court accepted the plaintiff's evidence as unchallenged and entered judgment for the claimed sum. The court also found that the plaintiff suffered inconvenience and loss of use of money due to the defendant's non-payment and awarded general damages. The claim for interest at 25% per annum was denied for lack of evidentiary basis, but interest at the court...

Court Disposition

Judgment for the plaintiff.

Orders

  • Special damages of UGX 9,088,200 awarded to the plaintiff.
  • General damages of UGX 2,000,000 awarded to the plaintiff.