[2021] UGHCLD 83
The court held that a litigant who represents himself is not entitled to professional fees under the Advocates Remuneration Rules, as these rules apply only to Counsel representing a client. The persuasive authority from the Kenyan High Court in Mwangi versus Invesco was adopted, emphasizing that self-represented...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2021] UGHCLD 83
- Parties
- Applicant: Housing Finance Bank Limited; Respondent: Patrick Nuwagaba
- Court
- HC: Land Division (Uganda)
- Jurisdiction
- Uganda
- Case Number
- Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 18 of 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Appeal / Ruling
- Outcome
- application_granted
- Judges
- Kawesa, J
- Legal Topics
- Taxation of Costs, Self Representation, Advocates Remuneration Rules
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Housing Finance Bank Limited
Applicant
Patrick Nuwagaba
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Appeal / Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a litigant who represents himself is entitled to professional fees under the Advocates Remuneration Rules.
- 2 Whether the taxation award in TA No. 099 of 2019 should be set aside.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that a litigant who represents himself is not entitled to professional fees under the Advocates Remuneration Rules, as these rules apply only to Counsel representing a client. The persuasive authority from the Kenyan High Court in Mwangi versus Invesco was adopted, emphasizing that self-represented parties may only recover disbursements, not instruction fees. Consequently, the taxation award was set aside and a fresh taxation was ordered to be conducted by the Deputy Registrar.
Court Disposition
application_granted
Orders
- The taxation award in TA No. 099 of 2019 is set aside.
- A fresh taxation shall be conducted by the Deputy Registrar of the Land Division.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
31 paragraphs
# **THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA IN THE HIGH COURT OF UGANDA AT KAMPALA LAND DIVISION**
#### **MISC. APPEAL NO.0018 OF 2019**
## **HOUSING FINANCE BANK LIMITED::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::APPLICANT VERSUS**
**PATRICK NUWAGABA::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::RESPONDENT**
**BEFORE: HON. MR. JUSTICE HENRY I. KAWESA**
### **RULING**
This is an application seeking for setting aside a Taxation in TA No. 099 of 2019.
I have looked at the application and supporting affidavit in reply. I have also looked at the submissions. I do find that the main issue is whether the respondent who represented himself is entitled to professional fees.
This issue is settled.
In the persuasive case of *Mwangi versus Invesco Misc. App No. 553/2013* where the Kenyan High Court stated that;
*"The Advocate; Mary Nduta Mwangi had elected to represent herself in the matter, there is not distinction between her and any ordinary litigant who chooses not to engage an Advocate… when a party takes it upon himself to file or defend a suit, then he cannot in my humble view ask for costs except the usual* *disbursement which he expended, but not instruction fees. In essence, he has not retained anybody to represent him. He is representing himself and the case in form a research and the usual trouble of going through litigation, has been done by himself"*
This should have been the approach the taxing master in the case before me should have followed since the Advocates Remuneration Rules apply only to Counsel who is representing a client, not one representing himself.
While I agree with the Applicant's arguments, I do not agree with the Respondent's arguments. I find that this finding answers all other areas which I do not find relevant to indulge.
The application is titled Misc. Appeal No.16 of 2019, brought under
Section 98 and O.9 r23 of the Civil Procedure Rules.
The application is granted and the taxation award is set aside.
A fresh taxation be conducted by the Deputy Registrar of this division.
Each party to bear its own costs of this application.
I so order.
……………………………..
Henry I. Kawesa **JUDGE**
29/03/2021
### 29/03/2021:
Patrick Turinawe for the Appellant.
Niwagaba Patrick; Respondent.
Patrick:
This matter is coming up for Ruling and we are ready to receive it.
Court:
Ruling delivered in the presence of the above parties.
……………………………..
Kakooza Elias **AG. DEPUTY REGISTRAR** 29/03/2021