[2003] UGSC 46

[2003] UGSC 46

The Supreme Court found merit in the applicant's request for an interim stay of execution, determining that the urgency and risk of irreparable harm justified restraining the respondent from executing the consent order and from disposing of or damaging the subject properties. The orders were made to preserve the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2003] UGSC 46
Parties
Applicant: Hussien Taherali Amji Malkan; Respondent: Hussien Abdulla Hamdan
Court
Supreme Court of Uganda
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Number
Civil Application 17 of 2003
Procedural Posture
Stay Application / Interim Order
Outcome
application granted
Judges
Oder, JSC
Legal Topics
Stay of Execution, Interim Orders, Consent Order, Compromise Agreement
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Stay of Execution Interim Orders Consent Order Compromise Agreement

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Hussien Taherali Amji Malkan

Applicant

Hussien Abdulla Hamdan

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Stay Application / Interim Order

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to an interim stay of execution of the consent order dated 7th October 2002.
  2. 2 Whether the respondent should be restrained from disposing of or damaging properties pending determination of the compromise agreement.

Ratio Decidendi

The Supreme Court found merit in the applicant's request for an interim stay of execution, determining that the urgency and risk of irreparable harm justified restraining the respondent from executing the consent order and from disposing of or damaging the subject properties. The orders were made to preserve the status quo until the settlement cum compromise agreement is set aside or until further order of the court. Costs were reserved to be determined in the main cause.

Court Disposition

application granted

Orders

  • The respondent Hussein Abdulla Hamdan is restrained from execution of the consent order dated 7th October 2002 arising from the settlement cum compromise agreement dated 2nd October 2002 in Supreme Court Civil Appeal No. 9 of 2002 until the agreement is set aside or until further order of the court.
  • The respondent is restrained from disposing of or damaging properties on plots Nos. 30, 32 and 102/104, William Street, Kampala, or evicting tenants therefrom until the occurrence of the events specified above.