[2003] UGCommC 8

[2003] UGCommC 8

The court found that the Plaintiff complied with the terms of the Purchase Agreement for the travellers cheques, and the 2nd Defendant ultimately refunded the principal sum. However, the agreement did not require an immediate refund upon notification of loss; a reasonable period for investigation was implied. The...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2003] UGCommC 8
Parties
Plaintiff: Ibrahim Kibirige; Defendant: UCB; Defendant: Citicorp
Court
Commercial Court of Uganda
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Number
Civil Suit No. 408 of 2000
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Judgment
Outcome
action dismissed
Legal Topics
Breach of Contract, Agency Liability, Travellers Cheques, Damages, Refund Claims
Source Language
en
Commercial and Corporate Breach of Contract Agency Liability Travellers Cheques Damages Refund Claims

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ibrahim Kibirige

Plaintiff

UCB

Defendant

Citicorp

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Suit / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the 2nd Defendant breached the contract by failing to refund the value of lost travellers cheques promptly.
  2. 2 If so, whether the Plaintiff is entitled to general damages and interest, and in what amount.
  3. 3 Whether the Plaintiff is entitled to costs.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the Plaintiff complied with the terms of the Purchase Agreement for the travellers cheques, and the 2nd Defendant ultimately refunded the principal sum. However, the agreement did not require an immediate refund upon notification of loss; a reasonable period for investigation was implied. The delay in refunding was not found to be a breach of contract, as the Defendant needed time to verify the claim. The Plaintiff's claims for interest and special damages were disallowed due to lack of contractual or legal basis and insufficient proof. The Plaintiff's action was dismissed, and no costs were awarded to the 2nd Defendant, as it did not participate in the proceedings.

Court Disposition

action dismissed

Orders

  • Plaintiff's suit is dismissed.
  • No costs are awarded to the 2nd Defendant.