[2021] UGSC 67
The Supreme Court held that the application for recusal was without merit. Recusal is a personal matter for the Justice whose impartiality is questioned, and in this case, Owiny-Dollo CJ declined to recuse himself, providing reasons in his ruling. The court found no valid grounds to set aside previous rulings or...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2021] UGSC 67
- Parties
- Applicant: Male H. Mabirizi K. Kiwanuka; Respondent: Owiny-Dollo CJ
- Court
- Supreme Court of Uganda
- Jurisdiction
- Uganda
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Application 3 of 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Judges
- Owiny-Dollo, CJ, Kisaakye, JSC, Arach-Amoko, JSC, Opio-Aweri, JSC, Mwondha, JSC, Mugamba, JSC, Muhanguzi, JSC, Tuhaise, JSC, Mike Chibita, JSC
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Recusal, Judicial Bias, Presidential Election Petition, Court Composition
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Male H. Mabirizi K. Kiwanuka
Applicant
Owiny-Dollo CJ
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Owiny-Dollo CJ should recuse himself from hearing and determining Presidential Election Petition No.1 of 2021.
- 2 Whether previous rulings and proceedings where Owiny-Dollo CJ participated should be set aside or nullified.
Ratio Decidendi
The Supreme Court held that the application for recusal was without merit. Recusal is a personal matter for the Justice whose impartiality is questioned, and in this case, Owiny-Dollo CJ declined to recuse himself, providing reasons in his ruling. The court found no valid grounds to set aside previous rulings or nullify proceedings where Owiny-Dollo CJ participated. The integrity of the coram was maintained, and the application was dismissed as the applicant failed to establish any real likelihood of bias or conflict of interest warranting recusal.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- The application for recusal of Owiny-Dollo CJ is dismissed.
- All previous rulings and proceedings remain valid and are not set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
34 paragraphs
### THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF UGANDA AT KAMPALA
### MISC. APPLICATION NO.03 OF 2021
### (ARISING OUT OF PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION PETITION NO.1 OF $2021)$
#### **BETWEEN**
### KYAGULANYI SSENTAMU ROBERT VS YOWERI MUSEVENI TIBUHABURWA, ELECTORAL COMMISSION AND ATTORNEY **GENERAL**
## CORAM: OWINY-DOLLO CJ, KISAAKYE, ARACH-AMOKO, OPIO AWERI, MWONDHA, MUGAMBA, MUHANGUZI, TUHAISE & **CHIBITA, JJSC**
### IN THE MATER OF RECUSAL PROCEEDINGS
#### IN RE: APPLICATION FOR RECUSAL OF OWINY-DOLLO CJ
**BY**
### MALE H. MABIRIZI K. KIWANUKA ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
### **RULING OF THE COURT**
The applicant, Male H. Mabirizi K. Kiwanuka, filed this exparte application by Notice of Motion seeking the following orders:
- 1. Owiny-Dollo, CJ disqualifies/recuses himself from participation in hearing and determination of PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION PETITION NO:1 OF 2021 **IKYAGULANYI SSENTAMU ROBERT V YOWERI MUSEVENI TIBUHABURWA, ELECTORAL COMMISSION & ATTORNEY GENERAL** - 2. The Ruling in Misc. Application No:1 of 2021 SSENTAMU ROBERT **YOWERI VS IKYAGULANYI**
**MUSEVENI TIBUHABURWA, ELECTORAL COMMISSION &** Owiny-Dollo. CJ where **GENERALI ATTORNEY** participated be set aside for being null and void.
# 3. The proceedings of 09<sup>th</sup> February 2021 and 11<sup>th</sup> February, 2021 where Owiny-Dollo, CJ participated be nullified.
The applicant addressed the court as constituted regarding the application for recusal contained in the first order sought. Thereafter Hon. Justice Owiny-Dollo, CJ declined to recuse himself for reasons he later stated in his ruling. In effect Owiny-Dollo, CJ continued legally to sit not only as a member of the coram but as its head. Needless to say, recusal is not a coram decision. It is personal to the Justice whose recusal is sought. While the response on the recusal disposes of the first order sought, we deem it moot to deal with the two subsequent orders sought, given that the corara remains intact and we find no valid grounds to disturb the said impugned rulings.
Consequently, we dismiss this application.
DATED at Kampala this 17<sup>th</sup> day of March, 2021.
Hon Justice Alfonse Owiny-Dollo, **Chief Justice**
Hon Justice Dr. Esther K. Kisaakye JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT
Hon. Justice Stella Arach-Amoko JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT
Hon. Justice Rubby Opio-Aweri JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT
Tilmendee ............
Hon, Justice Faith Mwondha JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT
Hon. Justice Paul Mugamba JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$\cdots$
$\begin{smallmatrix}&&&\\0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0$
.......................................
Hon. Justice Ezekiel Muhanguzi JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT
MAN
Hon. Justice Percy Night Tuhaise JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT
Hon. Justice Mike Chibita JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT