[2006] UGHC 66
The applicant was detained for a period exceeding the constitutionally mandated 48 hours before being charged in a court of law, which constitutes a violation of his constitutional rights. However, by the time the habeas corpus application was filed, the applicant had already been charged and remanded to prison,...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2006] UGHC 66
- Parties
- Applicant: Mulema Joseph; Respondent: Attorney General; Respondent: Commanding Officer, Makindye Military Barracks
- Court
- High Court of Uganda
- Jurisdiction
- Uganda
- Case Number
- Misc. Cause No. 230 of 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Cause / Ruling
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Habeas Corpus, Unlawful Detention, Right to Be Charged Within 48 Hours
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mulema Joseph
Applicant
Attorney General
Respondent
Commanding Officer, Makindye Military Barracks
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Cause / Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the continued detention of Mulema Joseph without being charged in a court of law within 48 hours violated his constitutional rights.
- 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to costs for the habeas corpus application given the circumstances of his detention and subsequent charging.
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant was detained for a period exceeding the constitutionally mandated 48 hours before being charged in a court of law, which constitutes a violation of his constitutional rights. However, by the time the habeas corpus application was filed, the applicant had already been charged and remanded to prison, rendering the application unnecessary. The precedent set in Capt. Ronald Nyanzi's case, where costs were awarded due to justified unlawful detention, does not apply here as the applicant's counsel is not pursuing damages for the constitutional violation in this cause. The appropriate remedy for the violation is a separate suit for damages, not an award of costs in this...
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- No costs are awarded to either party.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
{\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\uc1\deff0\stshfdbch0\stshfloch0\stshfhich0\stshfbi0\deflang2057\deflangfe2057{\fonttbl{\f0\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02020603050405020304}Times New Roman;}{\f171\froman\fcharset238\fprq2 Times New Roman CE;} {\f172\froman\fcharset204\fprq2 Times New Roman Cyr;}{\f174\froman\fcharset161\fprq2 Times New Roman Greek;}{\f175\froman\fcharset162\fprq2 Times New Roman Tur;}{\f176\froman\fcharset177\fprq2 Times New Roman (Hebrew);} {\f177\froman\fcharset178\fprq2 Times New Roman (Arabic);}{\f178\froman\fcharset186\fprq2 Times New Roman Baltic;}{\f179\froman\fcharset163\fprq2 Times New Roman (Vietnamese);}}{\colortbl;\red0\green0\blue0;\red0\green0\blue255;\red0\green255\blue255; \red0\green255\blue0;\red255\green0\blue255;\red255\green0\blue0;\red255\green255\blue0;\red255\green255\blue255;\red0\green0\blue128;\red0\green128\blue128;\red0\green128\blue0;\red128\green0\blue128;\red128\green0\blue0;\red128\green128\blue0; \red128\green128\blue128;\red192\green192\blue192;}{\stylesheet{\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \snext0 Normal;}{\*\cs10 \additive \ssemihidden Default Paragraph Font;}{\*\ts11\tsrowd\trftsWidthB3\trpaddl108\trpaddr108\trpaddfl3\trpaddft3\trpaddfb3\trpaddfr3\trcbpat1\trcfpat1\tscellwidthfts0\tsvertalt\tsbrdrt\tsbrdrl\tsbrdrb\tsbrdrr\tsbrdrdgl\tsbrdrdgr\tsbrdrh\tsbrdrv \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs20\lang1024\langfe1024\cgrid\langnp1024\langfenp1024 \snext11 \ssemihidden Normal Table;}{\s15\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar \tqc\tx4320\tqr\tx8640\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext15 \styrsid5112972 footer;}{\*\cs16 \additive \sbasedon10 \styrsid5112972 page number;}} {\*\latentstyles\lsdstimax156\lsdlockeddef0}{\*\rsidtbl \rsid2432597\rsid5112972\rsid5513125\rsid6187384\rsid7822100\rsid8461634\rsid12333622\rsid14491072\rsid14638508\rsid15037825\rsid15205057}{\*\generator Microsoft Word 11.0.5604;}{\info {\title THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA}{\author rkasule}{\operator jchemeri}{\creatim\yr2009\mo3\dy17\hr12\min26}{\revtim\yr2009\mo3\dy17\hr12\min26}{\printim\yr2007\mo7\dy4\hr10\min16}{\version2}{\edmins2}{\nofpages2}{\nofwords366}{\nofchars2089} {\*\company Courts Of Judicature}{\nofcharsws2451}{\vern24689}}\widowctrl\ftnbj\aenddoc\noxlattoyen\expshrtn\noultrlspc\dntblnsbdb\nospaceforul\formshade\horzdoc\dgmargin\dghspace180\dgvspace180\dghorigin1800\dgvorigin1440\dghshow1\dgvshow1 \jexpand\viewkind1\viewscale120\pgbrdrhead\pgbrdrfoot\splytwnine\ftnlytwnine\htmautsp\nolnhtadjtbl\useltbaln\alntblind\lytcalctblwd\lyttblrtgr\lnbrkrule\nobrkwrptbl\snaptogridincell\allowfieldendsel\wrppunct \asianbrkrule\rsidroot5513125\newtblstyruls\nogrowautofit \fet0{\*\ftnsep \pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\insrsid6187384 \chftnsep \par }}{\*\ftnsepc \pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\insrsid6187384 \chftnsepc \par }}{\*\aftnsep \pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\insrsid6187384 \chftnsep \par }}{\*\aftnsepc \pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\insrsid6187384 \chftnsepc \par }}\sectd \linex0\headery708\footery708\colsx708\endnhere\sectlinegrid360\sectdefaultcl\sftnbj {\footer \pard\plain \s15\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar \tqc\tx4320\tqr\tx8640\pvpara\phmrg\posxr\posy0\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid2432597 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\field{\*\fldinst {\cs16\insrsid5112972 PAGE }}{\fldrslt { \cs16\lang1024\langfe1024\noproof\insrsid15205057 2}}}{\cs16\insrsid5112972 \par }\pard \s15\ql \li0\ri360\widctlpar\tqc\tx4320\tqr\tx8640\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin360\lin0\itap0\pararsid5112972 {\insrsid5112972 \par }}{\*\pnseclvl1\pnucrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl2\pnucltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl3\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl4\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta )}} {\*\pnseclvl5\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl6\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl7\pnlcrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl8 \pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl9\pnlcrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}\pard\plain \qc \li0\ri0\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid15205057 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5112972\charrsid15205057 THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5513125\charrsid15205057 \par }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5112972\charrsid15205057 IN THE HIGH COURT OF UGANDA AT KAMPALA \par MISCELLANEOUS CAUSE NO. 230 OF 2006 \par THE JUDICATURE (HABEAS CORPUS) RULES \par IN THE MATTER OF SECTION 34 OF THE JUDICATURE ACT \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5112972\charrsid15205057 AND \par }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5112972\charrsid15205057 IN THE MATTER}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid14491072\charrsid15205057 }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5112972\charrsid15205057 OF MULEMA JOSEPH \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5112972\charrsid15205057 AND \par }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5112972\charrsid15205057 IN THE MATTER OF APPLICATION FOR}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid14638508\charrsid15205057 WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS A}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5112972\charrsid15205057 D SUBJICIENDUM \par \par \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid15205057 {\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5112972\charrsid15205057 BEFORE: HON. AG. JUDGE REMMY K. KASULE}{ \b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5513125\charrsid15205057 \par }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5112972\charrsid15205057 \par \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5513125\charrsid15205057 RULING}{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12333622\charrsid15205057 \par }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5513125\charrsid15205057 \par \par }\pard \qj \li0\ri0\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid15205057 {\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5513125\charrsid15205057 On 8}{\lang2057\langfe1033\super\langnp2057\insrsid5513125\charrsid15205057 th }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5513125\charrsid15205057 December, 2006, this Court issued a writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Subjiciendum directed at the commanding officer, Makindye Military Barracks and the Attorney General to produce in Court on 15} {\lang2057\langfe1033\super\langnp2057\insrsid5513125\charrsid15205057 th}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5513125\charrsid15205057 December 2006, at 9.00a.m. One Mulema Joseph, allegedly detained at Makindye Military Barracks. \par \par A Return to the writ has been filed by the Commanding Officer through the Attorney General. The Return states that Mulema Jo seph was charged before the General Court Martial at Makindye with the Military offence of unlawful possession of Firearms under the appropriate law and was rem}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid14638508\charrsid15205057 anded to Kigo Government Prison}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5513125\charrsid15205057 on 14}{\lang2057\langfe1033\super\langnp2057\insrsid5513125\charrsid15205057 th}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5513125\charrsid15205057 November, 2006. \par \par Mr. Ssebanja Abubaker, Counsel for the detainee, in view of the Return, is }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid14638508\charrsid15205057 not pursuing any further the Habeas Corpus}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5513125\charrsid15205057 application. He however, relying on }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5513125\charrsid15205057 Miscellaneous Cause No. 100 of 2002: In the Matter of Capt. Ronald Nyanzi,}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5513125\charrsid15205057 (Bamwine J., 27.08.02)}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid14638508\charrsid15205057 ,}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5513125\charrsid15205057 applies that applicant }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid14491072\charrsid15205057 be }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5513125\charrsid15205057 awarded costs of the application as his }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5112972\charrsid15205057 C}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5513125\charrsid15205057 onstitutional rights have been violated since he was not charged in a Court of law within 48 hours of his arrest. \par \par In this application the applicant was arrested on 8}{\lang2057\langfe1033\super\langnp2057\insrsid5513125\charrsid15205057 th}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5513125\charrsid15205057 June 2006 and was charged in court on 14}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\super\langnp2057\insrsid5513125\charrsid15205057 th}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5513125\charrsid15205057 November 2006. The Habeas Corpus application was filed in Court on 20}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\super\langnp2057\insrsid5513125\charrsid15205057 th}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5513125\charrsid15205057 November 2006. This application was thus totally unnecessary. \par \par In Capt. Ronald Nyanzi\rquote s case, the applicant had been arrested on 17}{\lang2057\langfe1033\super\langnp2057\insrsid5513125\charrsid15205057 th}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5513125\charrsid15205057 July 2002. }{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5112972\charrsid15205057 He}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5513125\charrsid15205057 was only taken to the unit Disciplinary Committee on 22}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\super\langnp2057\insrsid5513125\charrsid15205057 nd}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5513125\charrsid15205057 August 2002, after the writ of Habeas Corpus had been served on the detaining authority. The application was he}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid14638508\charrsid15205057 nc}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5513125\charrsid15205057 e justified. An award of costs was therefore appropriate. \par \par While it is true that in this present application, the applicant was not charged before a lawful Court within 48 hours as the Constitution provides}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5112972\charrsid15205057 , this is a matter for damages, whi}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5513125\charrsid15205057 ch Counsel for applicant is not pursuing in this cause. \par \par This can be pursued in a separate suit. \par \par Court is of the view, given the facts of this application, that the best order to make is not to award any costs to either party. It is so ordered. \par \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5513125\charrsid15205057 Remmy K. Kasule \par Ag. Judge \par 18}{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\super\langnp2057\insrsid5513125\charrsid15205057 th}{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5513125\charrsid15205057 December 2006 \par }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid5513125\charrsid15205057 \par \par \par \par \par }}