[2018] UGHCFD 16
The High Court has jurisdiction to determine applications for legal guardianship under the Constitution, Judicature Act, and Civil Procedure Act. The applicant, who is the biological father and caretaker of the minors, purchased and registered land in the names of the children and their mother. The application seeks...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] UGHCFD 16
- Parties
- Applicant: Ssentongo Edward Francis; Respondent: Tamale Joshua; Respondent: Kawuki Joel; Respondent: Tyaba Jonathan Francis
- Court
- HC: Family Division (Uganda)
- Jurisdiction
- Uganda
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Cause No. 88 of 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Legal Guardianship
- Outcome
- application granted
- Judges
- Kitariisibwa-Katunguka, J
- Legal Topics
- Legal Guardianship, Welfare of Children, Custody, Property Management for Minors
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ssentongo Edward Francis
Applicant
Tamale Joshua
Respondent
Kawuki Joel
Respondent
Tyaba Jonathan Francis
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Legal Guardianship
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to entertain the application for legal guardianship.
- 2 Whether the application for legal guardianship should be granted in the best interests of the minors.
Ratio Decidendi
The High Court has jurisdiction to determine applications for legal guardianship under the Constitution, Judicature Act, and Civil Procedure Act. The applicant, who is the biological father and caretaker of the minors, purchased and registered land in the names of the children and their mother. The application seeks legal guardianship to enable the applicant to manage and administer the property, including securing a loan to construct rentals for the children's welfare. The court found that the minors, being underage, cannot contract or secure loans, and the applicant's actions are in their best interests. The application is supported by the biological mother and is consistent with the...
Court Disposition
application granted
Orders
- Legal guardianship of Tamale Joshua, Kawuki Joel, and Tyaba Jonathan Francis is granted to Ssentongo Edward Francis in respect of managing and administering the land comprised in Kyadondo Block 180, Plot 12140 at Namugongo.
- The order of legal guardianship is solely for the welfare of the children Tamale Joshua, Kawuki Joel, and Tyaba Jonathan Francis.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
27 paragraphs
## **THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA IN THE HIGH COURT OF UGANDA HOLDEN AT KAMPALA [FAMILY DIVISION] HCT-00-FD-FC- NO – 88 OF 2017** 5 **IN THE MATTER OF TAMALE JOSHUA, KAWUKI JOEL, AND TYABA JONATHAN FRANCIS AND IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR LEGAL GUARDIANSHIP BY SSENTOGO EDWARD FRANCIS**
#### **BEFORE: HON. LADY JUSTICE KETRAH KITARIISIBWA KATUNGUKA**
## **RULING**
- 15 This is an application for Legal Guardianship brought under **Article 139** of the Constitution of the Republic of Uganda 1995, **Section 14** of the Judicature Act Cap 13, **Sections 1** and **3** and **Schedule 1** of the Children Act Cap 59, and **Section 98** of the Civil Procedure Act Cap 71 for orders that; - i) Legal guardianship of Tamale Joshua, Kawuki Joel and Tyaba Jonathan is 20 granted to Ssentongo Edward Francis in respect of creating, managing and administering the land comprised in Kyadondo Block 180, Plot 12140 at Namugongo. - ii) The applicant be appointed legal guardian in respect of the education and planning needs of Tamale Joshua, Kawuki Joel and Tyaba Jonathan 25 Francis.
The Application is supported by affidavit of the applicant. The Birth certificate of the children and the title deed which is in the name of Shanon Semanda, the biological mother of the minors and the names of Tamale Joshua, Kawuki Joel and
30 Tyaba Jonathan Francis the minors, are attached.
The grounds of the application are contained in the affidavit of the applicant but briefly are that; the applicant has custody of the minors and he caters for all their needs; the applicant is the one who registered the land into the names of the children and their mother; the applicant wishes to secure a loan to construct rentals to cater for the needs of the children.
The applicant is represented by Counsel Bumpenje Christopher, who submitted that 5 the application is specifically for the welfare of the children.
Mr. Ssentongo, the applicant testified on Oath that the children stay with him and that according to an agreement for the purchase of the land in question, he bought it. This was confirmed by Ms Semanda the mother of the minors.
#### **Decision of Court**
I have carefully considered the application the affidavit in support, the copy of the title deed, the birth certificates attached, I have also listened to the testimony of the applicant and Ms. Semanda biological mother to the minors; the facts are that the
- 15 applicant bought land and registered it in the names of Semanda Shanon and the minors Tamale Joshua, Kawuki Joel and Tyaba Jouathan. All children of the applicant; that applicant takes care of the children's needs including school fees as per respect of Joshua Tamale and Joel Kawuke, that the mortgage the property for building loan for rentals for the welfare of the children. The application is supported - 20 by the biological mother of the children who is also the joint registered proprietor together with the children.
The issues for resolution are;
- (i) Whether this court has jurisdiction. - 25 (ii) Whether the application should be granted.
## **Issue 1**
## **Whether this court has jurisdiction to entertain this matter**
Article 139 of the Constitution of the Republic of Uganda 1995, Section 98 of the Civil Procedure Act Cap 71 and Section 14 of the Judicature Act Cap 13 give this 5 court powers to entertain applications of this nature. This court therefore has
jurisdiction to entertain this application.
#### **Issue 2**
#### **Whether this Application should be granted**
I therefore, make the following orders.
- **Section 1(i)** and **Section 3** and the 1st 10 schedule to the Children Act, Cap 59 provide that in addressing issues concerning children their welfare is the paramount consideration. Courts have fortified this in the case of **Joyce Deborah Alitubera and in the matter of Richard Masaba CA No 70 & 81 of 2011**. - 15 The Applicant bought the land for the children in their best interests; he intends to add value to the land by constructing rentals still in the interest of the children; the children are not able to secure the loan because they are minors and cannot contract; and they would be unable to pay the loan which the applicant is able to pay. This court is convinced that the application is the best interests of the children and 20 therefore should be granted.
In summary this court is seized with jurisdiction to entertain this matter, and the application is in the best interests of the minors,
25 (i) An Order for the Legal Guardianship, Tamale Joshua, Kawuki Joel and Tyaba Jonathan Francis is granted to Sentongo Edward Francis in respect of managing and administering the land comprised in Kyadondo 185 plot 12140, land at Namugongo.
(ii)The Order of Legal guardianship as detailed shall be solely for the welfare of the children Tamale Joshua, Kawuki Joel and Tyaba Jonathan Francis. (iii)The applicant shall bear the costs of this application.
# **KETRAH KITARIISIBWA KATUNGUKA JUDGE 19/4/2018**
5