[2001] ACHPR 33
The Commission has not yet rendered a final decision on the merits, as the matter is at the admissibility stage. The central issue is whether the complainant has provided sufficient evidence of exhaustion of local remedies, as required by Article 56(5) of the African Charter. The facts alleged, if proven, would...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2001] ACHPR 33
- Parties
- Applicant: Institute for Human Rights and Development; Respondent: Democratic Republic of Congo
- Court
- African Commission on Human and Peoples Rights
- Jurisdiction
- Uganda
- Case Number
- Communication 238 of 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Communication / Admissibility Decision Pending
- Outcome
- admissibility_pending
- Legal Topics
- Detention Without Trial, Torture and Inhuman Treatment, Exhaustion of Local Remedies, Right to Fair Trial, Freedom of Association
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Institute for Human Rights and Development
Applicant
Democratic Republic of Congo
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Communication / Admissibility Decision Pending
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the detention and treatment of Mr. Mboyo by AFDL soldiers violated Articles 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 13, 18 and 26 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights.
- 2 Whether the complainant has exhausted local remedies as required for admissibility under the African Charter.
- 3 Whether the facts as alleged constitute violations of the rights to liberty, security, dignity, fair trial, and freedom of association.
Ratio Decidendi
The Commission has not yet rendered a final decision on the merits, as the matter is at the admissibility stage. The central issue is whether the complainant has provided sufficient evidence of exhaustion of local remedies, as required by Article 56(5) of the African Charter. The facts alleged, if proven, would constitute serious violations of the Charter, including arbitrary detention, torture, and denial of fair trial rights. The Commission has requested further information from the applicant regarding steps taken to exhaust domestic remedies and has invited the respondent to submit its written response. The admissibility of the communication will depend on the sufficiency of this...
Court Disposition
admissibility_pending
Orders
- The applicant is directed to provide further clarification and evidence regarding exhaustion of local remedies.
- The respondent state is requested to submit its written response within two months of notification.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
18 paragraphs
## **13-27 October 2001 Communication No. 238/2001**
# **AFRICAN COMMISSION ON HUMAN AND PEOPLES' RIGHTS Thirtieth Ordinary Session 13-27 October 2001**
# **INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS AND DEVELOPMENT (ON BEHALF OF MBOYO)**
**v.**
## **DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF CONGO**
#### **DECISION**
BEFORE: CHAIRPERSON: Kamel Rezag-Bara VICE CHAIRPERSON: Jainaba Johm COMMISSIONERS: A. Badawi El Sheikh, Andrew R. Chigovera, Vera M. Chirwa, Emmanuel V. O. Dankwa, Yasser Sid Ahmed El-Hassan, Angela Melo, N. Barney Pityana, Hatem Ben Salem, Salimata Sawadogo
- Citation: Inst. for Human Rights and Dev. v. Dem. Rep. of Congo, Comm. 238/2001, 15 ACHPR AAR Annex V (2000-2001) - Publications: Documents of the African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights, Vol. 2, at 347 (Malcolm D. Evans & Rachel Murray eds., 2009); (2002) AHRLR 19 (ACHPR 2002)
#### RAPPORTEUR
29th session: Commissioner Isaac Nguema
30th session: Commissioner Tapsoba
SUMMARY OF FACTS
1. The Institute submitted the complaint on behalf of Mr Sedar Tumba Mboyo for Human Rights and Development, (the Institute for Human Rights and Development is a Human Rights NGO located in Banjul, the Gambia and since October 1999 has been granted observer status with the African Commission).
- 2. The communication was sent by post and was received at the Secretariat of the Commission on 21st November 2000. - 3. The applicant who has full powers to act on behalf of Mr. Tumba Sedar Mboyo, maintains that AFDL (the Alliance of Democratic Forces for Liberation) soldiers forced entry into Mr Sedar's Residence, and after having brutalised and intimidated his neighbourhood forcefully took him without warrant or explanation. - 4. He was bound hand and foot, kept in conditions where he could not satisfy his natural needs and subjected to "heavy handed" interrogation for three (3) days, after which he was accused of inciting a popular uprising. - 5. He was then transferred and detained together with ten or so other anti-Kabila protesters in the former Mobutu military camp. Mr Mboyo affirms that he was beaten and his rights infringed upon for two days by the three soldiers guarding him. - 6. Mr Mboyo was detained incommunicado for a total period of twenty three (23) days. - 7. The applicant recognises that Mr Mboyo's activities within a civilian association in which he headed some discussions in March 1998 may have led to these unfounded accusations. - 8. At the 29th ordinary session held in Tripoli, the rapporteur introduced the complaint. The Commission examined the communication and decided to be seized of the matter and recommended that the parties be informed accordingly. - 9. On 19th June 2001, the Secretariat of the African Commission informed the parties on the above decision and requested Respondent State to forward its written submissions within two (2) months from the date of notification of this decision - 10. On 20th June the Secretariat of the African Commission requested the Institute for Human Rights and Development to furnish clarification on the measures taken by the author to exhaust local remedies or any documents on his possession proving the all allegations.
## COMPLAINT
11. The Complainant is alleging that Articles 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 13, 18 and 26 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights have been violated.
## ACTION REQUIRED
Decision on admissibility should be made after additional information and evidence is got from the Complainant.