[2007] UGCommC 38

[2007] UGCommC 38

The court found that the cause of action accrued on 25th November 1997, when the loan was restructured and made repayable in four months. The statutory limitation period for actions founded on contract is six years from accrual of the cause of action. The suit was filed on 17th January 2006, well beyond the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2007] UGCommC 38
Parties
Plaintiff: International Credit Bank (in liquidation); Defendant: Happy James Tumwebaze Kwerija
Court
Commercial Court of Uganda
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Number
HCT-00-CC-CS 30 of 2006
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Preliminary Objection Ruling
Outcome
suit dismissed
Legal Topics
Contractual Limitation Period, Loan Recovery, Preliminary Objection, Dismissal of Suit
Source Language
en
Commercial and Corporate Civil Procedure Contractual Limitation Period Loan Recovery Preliminary Objection Dismissal of Suit

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

International Credit Bank (in liquidation)

Plaintiff

Happy James Tumwebaze Kwerija

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Suit / Preliminary Objection Ruling

  1. 1 Whether the suit is barred by limitation under section 3 of the Limitation Act.
  2. 2 Whether the plaint should be rejected under Order 7 rule 11 (d) of the Civil Procedure Rules due to statutory time bar.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the cause of action accrued on 25th November 1997, when the loan was restructured and made repayable in four months. The statutory limitation period for actions founded on contract is six years from accrual of the cause of action. The suit was filed on 17th January 2006, well beyond the limitation period. No exemption or disability was pleaded by the plaintiff. The plaint is therefore rejected under Order 7 rule 11 (d) of the Civil Procedure Rules, and the suit is dismissed with costs.

Court Disposition

suit dismissed

Orders

  • The plaint is rejected as time barred under section 3 of the Limitation Act and Order 7 rule 11 (d) of the Civil Procedure Rules.
  • The suit is dismissed with costs.