[1990] ACHPR 7

[1990] ACHPR 7

The Commission found that since Malawi was not a party to the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights at the time of the communication, the complaint could not be entertained. The Charter and the Commission's Rules of Procedure require that only communications against state parties to the Charter are...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[1990] ACHPR 7
Parties
Applicant: International PEN; Respondent: Malawi
Court
African Commission on Human and Peoples Rights
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Number
Communication 42 of 1990
Procedural Posture
Communication / Admissibility
Outcome
communication declared inadmissible
Legal Topics
Human Rights, Admissibility of Communications, State Party Status
Source Language
en
Public International Law Human Rights Admissibility of Communications State Party Status

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

International PEN

Applicant

Malawi

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Communication / Admissibility

  1. 1 Whether the communication is admissible against a state that is not a party to the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights.

Ratio Decidendi

The Commission found that since Malawi was not a party to the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights at the time of the communication, the complaint could not be entertained. The Charter and the Commission's Rules of Procedure require that only communications against state parties to the Charter are admissible. Therefore, the communication was declared inadmissible for lack of jurisdiction ratione personae.

Court Disposition

communication declared inadmissible

Orders

  • The communication is declared inadmissible.