[2019] AfCHPR 84

[2019] AfCHPR 84

The Court determined that, in the interests of justice and procedural fairness, the proceedings in Application No. 017/2016 should be reopened to allow the Applicant an opportunity to reply to the Respondent State's response on reparations. The Court found that the Respondent State's response was properly filed and...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] AfCHPR 84
Parties
Applicant: Deogratius Nicolaus Jeshi; Respondent: United Republic of Tanzania
Court
African Court on Human and Peoples Rights
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Number
Application No. 017/2016
Procedural Posture
Human Rights Application / Order for Reopening of Pleadings
Outcome
Order for reopening of pleadings; directions for further submissions.
Judges
Anukam J, Ben Achour J, Bensaoula J, Chizumila J, Eno R, Kioko VP, Matusse J, Mengue J, Mukamulisa J, Orè P, Tchikaya J
Legal Topics
Fair Trial Rights, Equality Before the Law, Right to Defence, Death Penalty, Reparations Procedure
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Constitutional Law Fair Trial Rights Equality Before the Law Right to Defence Death Penalty Reparations Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Deogratius Nicolaus Jeshi

Applicant

United Republic of Tanzania

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Human Rights Application / Order for Reopening of Pleadings

  1. 1 Whether the Respondent State violated the Applicant's right to a fair trial under the African Charter and Tanzanian Constitution.
  2. 2 Whether the Applicant's rights to equality before the law and equal protection by the law were infringed.
  3. 3 Whether the Applicant was denied the right to defence, including counsel of choice.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court determined that, in the interests of justice and procedural fairness, the proceedings in Application No. 017/2016 should be reopened to allow the Applicant an opportunity to reply to the Respondent State's response on reparations. The Court found that the Respondent State's response was properly filed and should be considered in the adjudication of reparations. This order ensures both parties have a fair opportunity to present their arguments on reparations, consistent with the principles of fair trial and equality before the law as enshrined in the African Charter and the Tanzanian Constitution. The Court's decision is grounded in its mandate to safeguard procedural rights and...

Court Disposition

Order for reopening of pleadings; directions for further submissions.

Orders

  • Proceedings in Application No. 017/2016 are hereby reopened.
  • The Respondent State's response to the Applicant's submissions on reparations is deemed properly filed.