[2009] UGHC 35

[2009] UGHC 35

The plaintiff failed to prove on a balance of probability that the defendant directly evicted or participated in the eviction from the matrimonial home. Her own witnesses confirmed that the actual eviction and harassment were carried out by the children of PW2, who were not made parties to the suit. The only...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2009] UGHC 35
Parties
Plaintiff: Joweria Katende; Defendant: Zaidi Semakula
Court
High Court of Uganda
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Number
HCT-00-FD-CS-0115-2006
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Judgment
Outcome
dismissed
Legal Topics
Matrimonial Home Rights, Eviction, Trespass to Land, Family Property Distribution
Source Language
en
Family and Children Land and Property Matrimonial Home Rights Eviction Trespass to Land Family Property Distribution

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Joweria Katende

Plaintiff

Zaidi Semakula

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Suit / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the defendant evicted or participated in the eviction of the plaintiff from her matrimonial home.
  2. 2 Whether the plaintiff suffered any damages as a result of the alleged eviction.
  3. 3 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to any other relief.

Ratio Decidendi

The plaintiff failed to prove on a balance of probability that the defendant directly evicted or participated in the eviction from the matrimonial home. Her own witnesses confirmed that the actual eviction and harassment were carried out by the children of PW2, who were not made parties to the suit. The only evidence against the defendant was that he stood surety for those children, which the court found insufficient to establish liability or sponsorship of their actions. The defendant provided credible evidence, corroborated by DW2, that he was not present at the time of the alleged eviction. The court concluded that the plaintiff's claim was not supported by the evidence and dismissed...

Court Disposition

dismissed

Orders

  • Plaintiff's suit is dismissed with costs to the defendant.