[1998] UGCA 19

[1998] UGCA 19

The Court of Appeal held that Anglo African Ltd. was properly authorized by a valid power of attorney to act on behalf of the landlord at the time of the eviction and distress for rent. The instructions to levy distress were given to Security Auctioneers, whose proprietor was a licensed court bailiff, and the second...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[1998] UGCA 19
Parties
Appellant: Joy Tumushabe; Appellant: Nyaburisa Enterprises Ltd.; Respondent: M/s Anglo African Ltd.; Respondent: Freddie M. Kasozi
Court
Court of Appeal of Uganda
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Number
Civil Appeal No 38 of 1997
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Final Judgment
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Distress for Rent, Eviction Procedure, Power of Attorney, Trespass to Land
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Distress for Rent Eviction Procedure Power of Attorney Trespass to Land

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Joy Tumushabe

Appellant

Nyaburisa Enterprises Ltd.

Appellant

M/s Anglo African Ltd.

Respondent

Freddie M. Kasozi

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Final Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the eviction of the appellants from the suit premises was carried out illegally.
  2. 2 Whether the respondents had authority to levy distress for rent and evict the appellants.
  3. 3 Whether the respondents were properly authorized under the Distress for Rent (Bailiffs) Act to act as bailiffs.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court of Appeal held that Anglo African Ltd. was properly authorized by a valid power of attorney to act on behalf of the landlord at the time of the eviction and distress for rent. The instructions to levy distress were given to Security Auctioneers, whose proprietor was a licensed court bailiff, and the second respondent acted as an employee under his supervision. The appellants were found to be trespassers who refused to recognize the owner's title and pay rent, and their eviction and the distress for rent were lawfully carried out in accordance with the Distress for Rent (Bailiffs) Act. The trial judge correctly admitted the challenged document and properly directed himself on the...

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed with costs to the respondents in this court and the court below.