[2005] UGCommC 63

[2005] UGCommC 63

The court found that the plaintiff's testimony contradicted her pleadings. While the plaint alleged a loan to the defendant company, her evidence indicated that the loan was given to Denis Makuba personally, not to the company. Denis Makuba, although initially a defendant, was struck off the suit, leaving only the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2005] UGCommC 63
Parties
Plaintiff: Judith Abaho; Defendant: SD Agri-Hitech (U) Ltd
Court
Commercial Court of Uganda
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Number
HCT-00-CC-CS 70 of 2005
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Judgment
Outcome
suit dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
Loan Disputes, Contract Formation, Company Liability
Source Language
en
Commercial and Corporate Loan Disputes Contract Formation Company Liability

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Judith Abaho

Plaintiff

SD Agri-Hitech (U) Ltd

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Suit / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether there was a valid contract between the plaintiff and the defendant.
  2. 2 Whether the contract was breached and by whom.
  3. 3 What remedies are available to the parties.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiff's testimony contradicted her pleadings. While the plaint alleged a loan to the defendant company, her evidence indicated that the loan was given to Denis Makuba personally, not to the company. Denis Makuba, although initially a defendant, was struck off the suit, leaving only the company as defendant. The court held that, based on the plaintiff's own evidence, she failed to prove on a balance of probabilities that the loan was made to the defendant company. Consequently, no contract between the plaintiff and the defendant company was established, and the claim failed.

Court Disposition

suit dismissed with costs

Orders

  • The suit is dismissed with costs to the defendant.