[2025] UGHCLD 38

[2025] UGHCLD 38

The court held that it would be a miscarriage of justice to vacate the caveat without hearing from the parties who lodged it, as they were not parties to the present application. The respondent, Commissioner Land Registration, was not the caveator and could not justify the existence of the caveat. The proper...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2025] UGHCLD 38
Parties
Applicant: Kajubi Duncun; Applicant: Kitenda Robinson Lincon (Administrators of the late Kajubi Solomon Mcgrey); Respondent: Commissioner Land Registration
Court
HC: Land Division (Uganda)
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Number
Miscellaneous Cause 154 of 2024
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Cause / Ruling
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
Naluzze Aisha Batala, J
Legal Topics
Caveats, Removal of Caveat, Land Registration, Procedure for Vacating Caveat
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Caveats Removal of Caveat Land Registration Procedure for Vacating Caveat

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kajubi Duncun

Applicant

Kitenda Robinson Lincon (Administrators of the late Kajubi Solomon Mcgrey)

Applicant

Commissioner Land Registration

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Cause / Ruling

  1. 1 Whether the caveat under instrument no. KLA 124022 on the suit land should be vacated.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that it would be a miscarriage of justice to vacate the caveat without hearing from the parties who lodged it, as they were not parties to the present application. The respondent, Commissioner Land Registration, was not the caveator and could not justify the existence of the caveat. The proper procedure is for the applicants to sue the caveators or their legal representatives, who must then justify why the caveat should not be vacated. Bringing the application against the Commissioner Land Registration was improper, and the application was dismissed accordingly.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application is dismissed with no orders as to costs.