[1994] UGHCEP 1

## THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA

The Hon. Jostia Tsekoko

## IN THE HIGH COURT OF UGANDA AT JINJA

MISC. APPLICATION NO. 20/94

KAJUMBULA ROSE NADIOPE : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : PETITIONER **VERSUS**

1. THE RETURNING OFFICER

$\overline{a}$

2. TIRUSASIHA KATONGOLE DIFAS : : : : : : : : : : RESPONDENTS BEFORE: THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE C. M. KATO

## RULING

This is a petition lodged by the petitioner Kajumbula Rose Nadiope requesting this court to revise the deceased of the Ag. Chief Magistrate Jinja dated 7th July 1994. The back ground of this petition is that the present petitioner Kajumbula Nadiope Rose was one of the candidates who took part in the March 1994 Constituent Assembly Mections. She lost and filed a petition challenging the out come of the elections which were unfavourable to her. The petition was dismissed by the Ag. Chief Magistrate Jinja on the ground that it had been lodged out of time. She (Nadiope) then filed this petition requesting this court to revise the decision of the learned Ag. Chief Magistrate, Jinja.

The petition was filed under the provisions of section 84 of the Civil Procedure Act. The main ground upon which the petition was based was that the learned Ag. Chief Magistrate had dismissed the petitioner's earlier petition in an arbitrary manner after she had made her secret inquiries in the absence of the parties involved, in so doing she had acted illegally with material irregularity therefore there was miscarriage of justice.

Before I proceed to deal with the merits and demerits of this petition it is important to point out here that this court made an earlier ruling with regard to the issue of whether or not this court has jurisdiction to entertain this type of

$...$ /2


application in view of the provisions of rule 28(3) of the Constituent Assembly Rules; in that ruling I resolved that although this court has no appellate jurisdiction to entertain appeals arising out of a petition filed under the Constituent Assembly Statute the court has jurisdiction to revise the decision of the lower courts in those matters under the provisions of sections 3(1) and 11 of the Judicature Act and also section 84 of the Civil Procedure Act. All I can do here is to emphasise that this court's jurisdiction to make a revisional order was not affected by Rule 28(3) of the Constituent Assembly Court Rules.

One other preliminary matter which I would like to dispese of is the issue of the distinction between an appeal and a revision, while the powers of the court under the former are very wide its powers under the latter are restricited to the provisions of section 84 of the Civil Procedure Act. I have been prompted to bring out this distinction because Mr. Mugenyi the learned counsel who argued this petition on behalf of the petitioner appeared to have argued it as if it was an appeal which is not the case.

Turning to the merits and demerits of this petition, the learned counsel for the petitioner Mr. Mugenyi who addressed this court at a great length on a number of issues pointed out that the learned Ag. Chief Magistrate acted with material irregularities when she did not give the parties a chance to address her or to be heard after she had made her investigation into the matter and that she did not make a finding that the time to file the petition had expired under the Constituent Assembly Rules. On his part Mr. Kania who appeared for the 2nd respondent was of the view that no material irregularities had been occasioned by the finding of the Ag. Chief Magistrate and that before the Ag. Chief Magistrate had made her ruling all parties involved in this matter addressed her. At this point I must point out that the hearing of this petition proceeded ex-parte in respect to the 1st respondent under Rule $17(1)(a)$ of the Civil Procedure Rules because the learned counsel for the

$...13$

$-2-$


ist respondent did not turn up at the time when this petition came up for hearing although it had been adjourned in her presence.

The provisions of section 84 of the Civil Procedure Act under which this petition was filed read as follows:-

"84. The High Court may call for the record of any case which has been determined by any subordinate or magistrate's court and if such court appears to have --

(a) exercised a jurisdiction not vested in it in law; or

(b) failed to exercise a jurisdiction so vested; or

(g) acted in the exercise of its jurisdiction illegally

or with material irregularity or injustice, the High Court may revise the said case and may make such rder therein as it thinks fit:

Privided that no such power of revision shall be exercised-(1) unless the parties shall first be given the . opportunity of being heard; or 营 respective where, from lapse of time or other cause, the for serious of such power would involve serious hardship to any person."

under Although the petition itself does not specifically state under which of the 3 sub-sections of the above section the petition was filed, according to the arguments advanced in court when arguing this petition it was clear that the petition was based on subjection C of the section which is that the learned trial magistrate exercised her jurisdiction with material irregularity and injustice. The part of the learned Ag. Chief Magistrate's ruling which seems to have been the subject of this petition is contained in the following paragraph:-

However on inquiring after the preliminary objection raised by counsels for the respondents, I have found that Tes were fully paid on 3/5/1994 when the petitioner was cited as having deposited in court a sum of 147,000/- vide receipt no. 1715768. The inquiry also revealed that on $3/4/1994$ the petitioner deposited in court s sum of 3,000/vide no. 1691497 that is on the date of filing the applica-

$\frac{1}{2}$

$-3-$

**参**

像

**Thisland**


tion. Clearly this was an outright disgression from the provisions of the Constituent Assembly Rules S. I, 4/94 which rules are mendatory."

$-4-$

$\mathbf{v} \leq -\hat{\mathbf{v}}$

It is the case for the petitioner that the passage quoted above amounted to material irregularity because the learned Ag. Chief Magistrate had acted on her own to find more about the matter before her in the absence of the parties. With due respect I do not sceept that view because in that passage what the learned Ag. Chief Megistrate is saying is simply that when she checked on the records she confirmed what Mr. Kania had parlier on told her namely that the fees were not paid in time and that the last payment was made on $3/5/94$ . It was on that besig that she held that the case had been filed out of time. It is not therefore proper to suggest that the inquiries she carried and where inventer or were the basis of her ductors. In her ruling what she referred to as an inquiry was in fact a mermal short to clear up her mind on what the learned suggest had already addressed her upon. The learned counsel for the portioner conceded that the last payment of money and on 3/5/94 and that was the finding of the learned trial magistrate it was also what Mr. Konia had told her in his earlier ... mission. I find no material irregularity which has resulted in any kind of injustice to warrent this court revising the roling of the learned Ag. Chief Magistrate under section 84(c) of the Civil Procedure Act. The absence of the partition due

Mr. Mugenyi the learned counsel for the petitioner made a number of points in his forceful submissions but which I do not feel were relevant to this kind of petition. I will however deal with some of those issues briefly although they have no direct bearing to the final outcome of this petition.

are vive

respect 1 do not recom

It is not that of

corr. Mr. Mujenyi contended that payment of court fees is not the price to be paid by a party for his litigation but it is revenue callection by the government and that revenue can be collected at any time even after the case has been filed. He based this argument mainly on the provision of section 100 of the Civil Procedure Act. With due respect I agree with the

och that the Louiries she

come o what

1999年1月1日,中国中国共和国中国中国中国中国中国中国中国中国中国中国中国中国中国中国中国中国中 The one some that applications in the comment with mprombalClimic ... of them to hard a the best feaveled are a very send a service of the set of the large service of the dega-. Wait to positive or spin to provide the first of the west and togethy that had the six and the party that we are the problem of the pill . BOR-BA: DOUTISMODISO IN PRIMARY WITH APPENDIX DODISTANCE OF TEXT throughly be made by a middle solution and an an an an and gdanas progressions bas traduction website softworlds survives on any bally unpricipal per gradier at his state and compared tool to oppore; and it is not go the state of the rest of a set is a set of the sees a graduation as the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state o

$\overline{L} \rightarrow \overline{L} \rightarrow \overline{L}$

the property of the closed in the property of the property of

of beginning and during metropolicity to the stress of compacts CLIMPHONE LEGAL VARIATIONS CICALITY FROM DE SUPPORT (ANDRE NOCES ANA RA (SJO) agaande rementat prefessive tricke the same special with SPAN about the feature, made consumments definitions of Livin table classic than almost almost a more reading that the second Saphan apposition and idintuminate approximation the property. Some that the part of the Procure is a South of the Procure of the Procure is a South of the Procure of the Procure is a South of the Procure of the Procure of the Procure of the Procure of the Procure of the Procure of th SAPPORTED TO SENS THE SET OF THE VEHICLE OF THE VEHICLE The Proof work are upperlanked to the subset of the many division of the .acts table dead with plotomorphe Land, and the field and togeted ade aprilie de commentario arte composicione de composicio . Fore of LENGs Provisional and an analysis of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the st and at a proceeding a section of the section of all parties and Printer's Printer's Clark horse via March 2021 and division for the Printer's Clark bings hat if we have some political many and a service sent on parabolitary 作员的Aumain的标准的 地名美国伊斯特 的复数一种植物的 网络黑色 ,但是最成为了有其他行业的实践的工具。1995年1997年,他们在"世界最高级"以上的第三人称单数,但是他们在"地界"的时代。 with a the prime of the state of the prime of the state of the party of

st Modificate de l'estate vident de 1911. Estat de l'assistant d'estate 化过程的欧洲过去时和亚亚亚亚亚亚亚亚亚亚亚亚亚亚亚亚亚亚亚亚亚亚亚亚亚亚亚亚亚亚亚亚亚亚亚亚 。第13個a [fojiet] (18個a) 和2012年1月19日,他们的一个1971年1月10日,他们也是在中心在 Award Mark Control of State Control of Mark 1999 $\mathcal{L}_{\text{eff}} = \mathcal{L}_{\text{eff}} \mathcal{L}_{\text{eff}} \mathcal{L}_{\text{eff}} \mathcal{L}_{\text{eff}} \mathcal{L}_{\text{eff}} \mathcal{L}_{\text{eff}} \mathcal{L}_{\text{eff}} \mathcal{L}_{\text{eff}} \mathcal{L}_{\text{eff}} \mathcal{L}_{\text{eff}} \mathcal{L}_{\text{eff}} \mathcal{L}_{\text{eff}} \mathcal{L}_{\text{eff}} \mathcal{L}_{\text{eff}} \mathcal{L}_{\text{eff}} \mathcal{L}_{\text{eff}} \mathcal{L}_{\text{eff}} \mathcal{L}_{\text{eff}} \mathcal{L}_{\text{eff$

**国家規模理論を建設され、設定され、**

Clark Consumer College The Theorem

. Phillips at the first of the containing the

istrals i dels e tall permetalismo investima por materialismo aperido 计算机的数据的 医卵巢病 医过程分离 医红色试验 植物植物 blook a few of contract the property that the property in a second contract to be expected. Photo Proceeding of the State Through of Supervision of the Proceedings of the

2009/10/2004 Phone: 19. 300 to the Press State of the Press of

建立动能量

learned counsel's argument to the extend that the court can demand for proper court fees to be paid even after the case has been filed but according to the authorities available including the case... of: UNTA EXPORTS LED. V. CUSIOMS (1970)EA 648 which Mr. Mugenyi himself quoted a case is not validly before the court until the. last installment of the court fees has been paid.

$-5-$

The other point raised by Mr. Mugenyi is that the Constituent Assembly Statute does not state the time when the cause of action arises; with due respect to the learned counsel Rule 28(1) of the Constituent Assembly Rules clearly says that an election petition shall be filed within 30 days from the polling day which means the cause of action arises from the Polling day. Although this provision may sound not fair for a person who may not get the results of the elections until after a long time but that is not the same as saying that the statute does not provide for the day on which the cause of action-arises.

le Having said all that I find that this petition cannot demand succeed. It is accordingly dismissed with costs to the two silrespondents. It is hereby ordered that the ruling of the learned Ag. Chief Magistrate dated 7th July, 1994 be adhered to. In anyi himself quotad a case is low within before the court until

less installment of the court fage has teen onid.

C. M. KATO

The other point reised by in Marchyl in JUDGE the Constituent Assembly Statute does not state the time pla:31/10/1994 of action arises; with one respect to the learned counsel late 28(1) of ... the Constituent Assembly when clearly mays that an election petition and I be filed thin 30 days from the polling day which means the same of sotion trises from the Polling day. Although this provision der pound not foir for a person who may not get the realts of the elections until after a long time but that is net the same as as ing that the statute does not provide for the lay on which the cause of cother-wises.

ha addving seid all that I dind what the bething commute demand macachic India actorphia by the plass with courts continuous filrubuqual endera dilit. Les hace les manisires i discretifications influtivable armed Age Circles Maginaria in the Tar Only, 1984 be salboughinder. Mayonyi