[2025] UGHC 246

[2025] UGHC 246

The application for review was dismissed on the basis that the High Court does not possess the jurisdiction to review its own judgment delivered on appeal. The court relied on established precedent, specifically Erimiya Serunkuma vs. Elizabeth Nandyose (1959) EA 127, which clearly states that such power is not...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2025] UGHC 246
Parties
Applicant: Kalangwa Edward; Respondent: Senyama Amon
Court
High Court of Uganda
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Number
MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 1622 OF 2021
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
Kazaarwe, J
Legal Topics
Review of Judgment, Appellate Jurisdiction, Land Disputes
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Review of Judgment Appellate Jurisdiction Land Disputes

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kalangwa Edward

Applicant

Senyama Amon

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling

  1. 1 Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to review its own judgment given on appeal.

Ratio Decidendi

The application for review was dismissed on the basis that the High Court does not possess the jurisdiction to review its own judgment delivered on appeal. The court relied on established precedent, specifically Erimiya Serunkuma vs. Elizabeth Nandyose (1959) EA 127, which clearly states that such power is not vested in the High Court under any special jurisdiction. The applicant's request was therefore legally untenable, and the respondent was awarded costs.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application is dismissed with costs to the respondent.